Unemployment Rises in Canada, falls in U.S. but weak numbers in both countries suggest possible slow down

Statistics Canada and the U.S. bureau of labour statistics published their December unemployment numbers and there are signs of potential trouble in both sets of numbers. The unemployment rate rose in Canada to 7.2% and fell in the U.S. to 6.7 %. But the number of people in the labour force seeking work fell by a large amount in the U.S. and the total number of new jobs created in December was well below expectations, with only 75,000 additional jobs being added well below the number added in previous months. Revisions may improve that picture but for the time being its not a positive sign. The headline number is attractive-6.7 %seasonally adjusted(non seasonally adjusted its even better 6.5%) unemployment is the lowest rate in 6 years for the U.S. and it looks much better than the Canadian rate which is now .5 % points higher at 7.2 %. Any thought s at the Bank of Canada about raising interest rates will have to be put on hold. Instead they ought to consider lowering them. Equally important the trend in Government to promote cut backs needs to be reversed. While the national rate rose to 7.2 % in Canada the rate rise was substantial in both Ontario and Québec the manufacturing heartland of the country. Quebec’s rate rose to 7.7 % and unemployment in Montreal was 8.0% while Ontario’s rate rose to 7.9 %. On a provincial basis the Canadian rate of unemployment was as follows( the second number is the participation rate): Newfoundland +Labrador  10.8 %  61.2 %; PEI  11.5 % 68.8 %; Nova Scotia  9.2 %  63.3 %; New Brunswick  9.7 % 63.3 %; Quebec  7.7%  65.3% ; Ontario  7.9%  66.3%; Manitoba  5.5%  68.2%; Saskatchewan 3.5 % 69.6 %; Alberta 4.8%  72.9%;  B.C. 6.6%  63.8 %.

 In the U.S. the key factor which explains the fall in the headline rate to 6.7% was the fall in the number of workers in the labour force. Some 74,000 net new jobs were added in the U.S. to the payroll but this is well below the revised 241,000 jobs added in November. It may well turn out that the December numbers will be revised upward or that they are largely due to the very bad weather that prevailed for a major part of the month. The broad measure of unemployment U6 remained at 13.1 %.So while the headline rate of 6.7 % is welcome news, labour participation rates need to rise and net new jobs need to be substantially increased over this month’s lower level in the coming months to maintain the positive momentum.This may well happen. In December’s report the government sector lost 13,000 jobs, health care a thousand and construction employment fell by 16,000 clear indications that the sequestration continues to impede even lower unemployment.


About haroldchorneyeconomist

I am Professor of political economy at Concordia university in Montréal, Québec, Canada. I received my B.A.Hons (econ.&poli sci) from the University of Manitoba. I also completed my M.A. degree in economics there. Went on to spend two years at the London School of Economics as a Ph.D. student in economics and then completed my Ph.D. in political economy at the University of Toronto. Was named a John W.Dafoe fellow, a CMHC fellow and a Canada Council fellow. I also was named a Woodrow Wilson fellow in 1968 after completing my first class honours undergraduate degree. Worked as an economist in the area of education, labour economics and as the senior economist with the Manitoba Housing and Renewal Corporation for the Government of Manitoba from 1972 to 1978. I also have worked as an economic consultant for MDT socio-economic consultants and have been consulted on urban planning, health policy, linguistic duality and public sector finance questions by the governments of Manitoba, Saskatchewan,the cities of Regina and Saskatoon, Ontario and the Federal government of Canada. I have also been consulted by senior leaders of the British Labour party, MPs from the Progressive Conservative party, the Liberal party and the New Democrats on economic policy questions. Members of the Government of France under the Presidency of Francois Mitterand discussed my work on public sector deficits. I have also run for elected office at the municipal level. I first began to write about quantitative easing as a useful policy option during the early 1980s.
This entry was posted in austerity, Canada, Federal Reserve, fiscal policy, full employment, government shut down+debt ceiling U.S., monetary policy, U.S., Uncategorized, unemployment and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s