Sequester underway in U.S. Cracks appear in British austerity wall.

We will soon be a full week into the foolish sequester experience in the U.S. So far it is way too soon to assess the damage to the growth rate and the slowdown in employment that cutting the first 100 billion $ from government spending will bring about.  But it ought to be clear that even this relatively small amount in comparison to overall spending sends the wrong signal about how to recover from a recession and is  nevertheless significant.

 Key areas being cut back include defense , important aspects of services to the poor and general provision of services in the U.S. More importantly it sends the wrong signal to consumers and employees that the time for retrenchment is now just when the economy was showing some signs of recovery. The bullish tendency in the stock market if it continues, supported as it is by an accommodating monetary policy benefits wealthier Americans and the financial markets but this needs to be translated into job creating investments and not just increased savings for those who own stocks.

In the U.K. where growth has turned negative and the economy is on the cusp of a triple dip recession the senior Liberal Democrat minister of business Vincent Cable has called for a program of investment in education, infrastructure and housing financed by deficit spending as a partial alternative to the Osborne austerity program.He argues that the markets might well accept this as an alternative to the full speed ahead strategy of Osborne, Cameron and Clegg. Although Cable is proposing only a modest investment program in his article in The New Statesman this is an important break in the wall of the austerity co-alition that emerged out of the last election and it is an important development.


About haroldchorneyeconomist

I am Professor of political economy at Concordia university in Montréal, Québec, Canada. I received my B.A.Hons (econ.&poli sci) from the University of Manitoba. I also completed my M.A. degree in economics there. Went on to spend two years at the London School of Economics as a Ph.D. student in economics and then completed my Ph.D. in political economy at the University of Toronto. Was named a John W.Dafoe fellow, a CMHC fellow and a Canada Council fellow. I also was named a Woodrow Wilson fellow in 1968 after completing my first class honours undergraduate degree. Worked as an economist in the area of education, labour economics and as the senior economist with the Manitoba Housing and Renewal Corporation for the Government of Manitoba from 1972 to 1978. I also have worked as an economic consultant for MDT socio-economic consultants and have been consulted on urban planning, health policy, linguistic duality and public sector finance questions by the governments of Manitoba, Saskatchewan,the cities of Regina and Saskatoon, Ontario and the Federal government of Canada. I have also been consulted by senior leaders of the British Labour party, MPs from the Progressive Conservative party, the Liberal party and the New Democrats on economic policy questions. Members of the Government of France under the Presidency of Francois Mitterand discussed my work on public sector deficits. I have also run for elected office at the municipal level. I first began to write about quantitative easing as a useful policy option during the early 1980s.
This entry was posted in austerity, deficit hysteria, monetary policy, treasury view, U.K. economy, Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s