Unemployment and the Battleground states in the American election

The unemployment rate has played a large role in this election. The Republicans have claimed that unemployment and the slow rate of economic growth are the fault of President Obama and his stimulus policies. I have indicated in an earlier post how unfair and inaccurate this claim is. But the fact is that the rate of unemployment may well play a critical role in how voters behave in the election. So lets look at ten battleground states where according to the average of polls the gap between the two candidates is under 5 % points.

State      U* Jan.2009  Jan.2010  Sept.2012    Obama    Romney

Florida(29)        8.7%         11.9%        8.7%         49.1%       50.4%

Ohio (18)           8.6          10.8         7.0                48.6         45.2

Pa.  (20)              6.8          8.8         8.0                49.1           45.2

N.Carolina(15)  9.2          11.1          9.0                 46.3          48.5

Virginia(13)         5.7         6.9          6.0                 47.6           46.5

Wisconsin(10)     7.1         8.7         7.6                  50.3           46.1

Colorado(9)         6.7        7.4         8.4                   47.7           46.3

Nevada(6)            9.6        13.0      11.9                   48.8           45.6

Iowa(6)                5.2         6.6        5.2                     49.3           45.2

New Hamp.(4)    5.2        7.0        5.7                     49.2            45.7

Notes:        U* is the rate of unemployment given for three different dates; the beginning of Obama’s term in office, the peak of unemployment and currently. The number in brackets following the name of the state is the number of electoral college votes that state has.

What we can see is that except for Colorado, the rate of unemployment has declined significantly from its January 2010 peak in all of these states. But in comparison to the position of the state at the beginning of 2009 only Ohio is much better off than before.Hence it would be very surprising if Obama were to lose Ohio.Unemployment has now fallen to 7 % in Ohio in comparison to 8.6 % in January 2009. A number of other states like Florida, Iowa and Virginia are either at, just below or very close to their 2009 rate of unemployment. North Carolina, New Hampshire and Wisconsin are each within .7 percent of their January 2009 rate of unemployment and also more than one percentage point point below their January 2010 peak. So if improving unemployment is a major factor, other things being equal in this election these states should fall into the Obama column come election day.In Pennsylvania unemployment has fallen .8 percentage points since its peak in 2010 but it remains 1.2 % points above the rate it had in January of 2009. However, President Obama has a relatively strong lead in the polls there , 4.9 % points, so it may well also be a Democratic party win.  In the end all elections are usually multi factorial but it will be interesting to see if improving employment delivers the vote on election day.

Advertisements

About haroldchorneyeconomist

I am Professor of political economy at Concordia university in Montréal, Québec, Canada. I received my B.A.Hons (econ.&poli sci) from the University of Manitoba. I also completed my M.A. degree in economics there. Went on to spend two years at the London School of Economics as a Ph.D. student in economics and then completed my Ph.D. in political economy at the University of Toronto. Was named a John W.Dafoe fellow, a CMHC fellow and a Canada Council fellow. I also was named a Woodrow Wilson fellow in 1968 after completing my first class honours undergraduate degree. Worked as an economist in the area of education, labour economics and as the senior economist with the Manitoba Housing and Renewal Corporation for the Government of Manitoba from 1972 to 1978. I also have worked as an economic consultant for MDT socio-economic consultants and have been consulted on urban planning, health policy, linguistic duality and public sector finance questions by the governments of Manitoba, Saskatchewan,the cities of Regina and Saskatoon, Ontario and the Federal government of Canada. I have also been consulted by senior leaders of the British Labour party, MPs from the Progressive Conservative party, the Liberal party and the New Democrats on economic policy questions. Members of the Government of France under the Presidency of Francois Mitterand discussed my work on public sector deficits. I have also run for elected office at the municipal level. I first began to write about quantitative easing as a useful policy option during the early 1980s.
This entry was posted in American Presidential election, U.S., unemployment and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s