Charest scores well in one on one debates against Marois and Legault

Jean Charest has now completed his cycle of three debates against the other party leaders. Once again he showed himself to be a skilled debater strongly defending himself against attack and inflicting some damage of his own on his opponents. Of course, one’s judgement depends upon one’s perception which is heavily influenced by one’s own values and preferences. But from my perspective Charest effectively showed why for most voters in Québec, Madame Marois is overly obsessed with sovereignty, referendum, divisive cultural policies and unpleasant identity politics. With respect to François Legault, who was much more polite than Marois, Charest was able to plant seeds of doubt about improper fund raising in the past by one of his star candidates Jacques Duschenau in a previous 1996 campaign for mayor of Montréal. He also raised important questions about Legault’s reliability as a federalist and the internal logic and financial coherence  of his policies.

On the federalist front Legault had a good counter citing the Quiet Revolution of the nationalist Liberal politician Jean Lesage whose own cabinet when he was premier in the 1960s included René Lévesque the first leader of the PQ and Eric Kierans, later a leadership canidate for the federal Liberals and member of the cabinet of the first government of Pierre Trudeau .

Legault argued that he was fashioning himself in this Lesage mould. It is a legitimate point and certainly Robert Bourassa like Legault was a conditional federalist. But unlike Legault, neither Lesage nor Bourassa were Parti Québecois cabinet ministers. Legault had some interesting ideas about educational reform and lowering Québec’s appalling high school drop out rate which deserve serious consideration but they will be undermined by the sort of budget slashing he wants to undertake. All in all then I thought Charest did a good job given the difficult situation he is in . Marois , on the other hand overplayed her sovereignist cards.

In fact, she may well have gone too far even with some of her own supporters.The latest poll from Forum research relying on a telephone survey of 1600 Québecers shows the PQ losing ground to the Liberals with some of their support leaking away to Québec Solidaire. The poll, one of a series to appear in the next few days shows the Liberals at 35 %, the PQ at 29 %, the CAQ at 24 % and Québec Solidaire at 9 %. If this holds up in other polls then the Liberals will win a strong minority and possibly a small majority government. However, for the moment its a single poll and we need more information from other surveys.

Advertisements

About haroldchorneyeconomist

I am Professor of political economy at Concordia university in Montréal, Québec, Canada. I received my B.A.Hons (econ.&poli sci) from the University of Manitoba. I also completed my M.A. degree in economics there. Went on to spend two years at the London School of Economics as a Ph.D. student in economics and then completed my Ph.D. in political economy at the University of Toronto. Was named a John W.Dafoe fellow, a CMHC fellow and a Canada Council fellow. I also was named a Woodrow Wilson fellow in 1968 after completing my first class honours undergraduate degree. Worked as an economist in the area of education, labour economics and as the senior economist with the Manitoba Housing and Renewal Corporation for the Government of Manitoba from 1972 to 1978. I also have worked as an economic consultant for MDT socio-economic consultants and have been consulted on urban planning, health policy, linguistic duality and public sector finance questions by the governments of Manitoba, Saskatchewan,the cities of Regina and Saskatoon, Ontario and the Federal government of Canada. I have also been consulted by senior leaders of the British Labour party, MPs from the Progressive Conservative party, the Liberal party and the New Democrats on economic policy questions. Members of the Government of France under the Presidency of Francois Mitterand discussed my work on public sector deficits. I have also run for elected office at the municipal level. I first began to write about quantitative easing as a useful policy option during the early 1980s.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s