Spanish unemployment 24.4 %;U.S. GDP up 2.2%:austerity not working.

This mornings news is anything but positive. U.S. growth is still positive but it would have been 0.6 % greater had  government cuts not subtracted from the total, leaving U.S. growth in the first quarter still positive but only modestly so. Once again we have evidence that austerity does not promote growth but has exactly the opposite impact when you are trying to recover from an economic slump. Just as I predicted last January and in fact have  been explaining ever since 1983. See my post of January 30, 2012, Austerity and Aggregate Demand, Some harsh facts.  (this blog)  More tragic evidence of how much damage austerity and belt tightening can do comes from the unemployment numbers in Spain where the rate has now reached 24.4 %, truly a depression level, which threatens to become chronic in Spain closely followed by the rate in Greece which is not far behind. 5.6 million Spanish workers are now unemployed. 1.08 million Greeks are similarly unemployed and the Greek rate of unemployment is 21.8 %. The obstinate refusal of the leading figures at the ECB and some of the European leadership to understand how inappropriate austerity is  is extraordinary. Cutting government expenditures in a misguided attempt to balance the books before you are close to low unemployment does not cause private investment to increase. It has just the opposite effect. Bond market speculators are not job creating  entrepreneurs.

Furthermore, cutting back does not cause the real wage to fall to the mythical classical  labour market clearing  equilibrium level for the simple reason that the real wage is the outcome of the nominal wage and the rate of inflation which aside from oil, a cartelized resource, is falling not rising because of the depression.In the meantime the nominal cuts in wages and rising unemployment causes aggregate demand to shrink despite the falling prices as workers fearing for their jobs or actually losing them to cuts spend less. So the policy is doomed to fail and at the same time cause absolutely unnecessary hardship for millions of people

  • A much better more effective alternative to deal with rising debt levels is to create a Eurobond backed by as many countries as possible and making it accessible to member countries in proportion to their relative GDP and rate of unemployment, authorizing the ECB to trade in them and encourage fiscal stimulus that is specifically targeted at job creation.With the likely election of M.Hollande in France there ought to be an opportunity to place these items on the European agenda in the next few months. Once Europe is growing robustly again and the debt to GDP ratio is stabilizing then one can address the concerns of fiscal conservatives.
    (For an interesting technical paper which demonstrates the perversity of a policy of austerity in a currency union in countries with high unemployment and elevated private debt see Reiner Maurer, Why austerity can be self -defeating for member states of a currency union. Pforzheim University, Germany http.//ssrn.com/abstract=1998084) Maurer points out what I and some other Keynesian and post Keynesian economists have argued for many years about the perversity of deficit hysteria. One needs economic growth and interest rates below the rate of growth of the GDP to reduce the ratio of debt to GDP over time. In fact the late Robert Eisner in his excellent and under appreciated work How Real is the Federal Deficit demonstrated how running a high employment deficit-high unemployment deficits are often actually high employment surpluses- was stimulative of positive GDP growth and the stock market over a one to two year lag.)
Advertisements

About haroldchorneyeconomist

I am Professor of political economy at Concordia university in Montréal, Québec, Canada. I received my B.A.Hons (econ.&poli sci) from the University of Manitoba. I also completed my M.A. degree in economics there. Went on to spend two years at the London School of Economics as a Ph.D. student in economics and then completed my Ph.D. in political economy at the University of Toronto. Was named a John W.Dafoe fellow, a CMHC fellow and a Canada Council fellow. I also was named a Woodrow Wilson fellow in 1968 after completing my first class honours undergraduate degree. Worked as an economist in the area of education, labour economics and as the senior economist with the Manitoba Housing and Renewal Corporation for the Government of Manitoba from 1972 to 1978. I also have worked as an economic consultant for MDT socio-economic consultants and have been consulted on urban planning, health policy, linguistic duality and public sector finance questions by the governments of Manitoba, Saskatchewan,the cities of Regina and Saskatoon, Ontario and the Federal government of Canada. I have also been consulted by senior leaders of the British Labour party, MPs from the Progressive Conservative party, the Liberal party and the New Democrats on economic policy questions. Members of the Government of France under the Presidency of Francois Mitterand discussed my work on public sector deficits. I have also run for elected office at the municipal level. I first began to write about quantitative easing as a useful policy option during the early 1980s.
This entry was posted in austerity, deficit hysteria, deficits and debt, European unemployment, Greek sovereign debt crisis, Spain, Uncategorized, unemployment. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s