U.S. avoids default but unemployed will pay a steep price as slower growth is likely

It is not a very pleasing outcome.

President Obama and  more than half  the Democrats in Congress reluctantly accepted the lop sided package of austerity measures that the President and his team negotiated with a much tougher and strategically more cunning Republican party. The bill which is complex and about 74 pages in length  passed the House with a solid largely Republican based majority.It then passed the senate with support of most of the Democrats and a chunk of Republican Senators. The Republicans using their extreme Tea party faction as a battering ram got almost all of what they had wanted while the Democrats got very little in return. The Congressional Budget Office has evaluated the act as delivering $2.1 trillion in spending cuts over the next ten years with most of them becoming operational in 2013 and beyond. But some $25 billion look like they will occur in 2011 and 2012 when it is certain that the economy will still be mired in high unemployment.  The prospect of much more severe cuts in the years to come will chill private sector spending intentions for many months to come.The fact that there is established a  12 person executive committee with the powers to find a further 1.5 trillion in cuts or revenue increases doesn’t help matters because in any case 917 billion in cuts over the next ten years are being implemented and if the committee becomes deadlocked as it very well may, entitlements like medicare will become subject  to cross the board cuts. President Obama managed to exclude social security and medicaid from the first tranche of cuts but that doesn’t provide much protection in future negotiations.

As I have stated many times before it is a tragically misguided and misconceived policy choice that can only prolong the high unemployment that still prevails and with the legislation now prohibiting any sort of significant  counter-cyclical further stimulus the U.S is now constrained from doing anything significantly  positive about lowering unemployment through fiscal policy other than pleading with the private sector to hire people.

Yes we can, seems to have been transformed into no, we cannot.

The very negative reaction of the stock market also shows the futility of listening too closely to the markets when it comes to deciding economic policy. Their attention span is measured in nano seconds and they had already concluded that the U.S. would not default and quickly moved on to fixate on the likelihood of prolonged unemployment and slower growth. It is, of course, a good thing that the debt ceiling has been raised but it ought to have been possible to accomplish this without the unemployed  paying such a steep price.We shall see if this stock market decline is a one week wonder as further data becomes available or if it is the beginning of a new bearish phase.

Advertisements

About haroldchorneyeconomist

I am Professor of political economy at Concordia university in Montréal, Québec, Canada. I received my B.A.Hons (econ.&poli sci) from the University of Manitoba. I also completed my M.A. degree in economics there. Went on to spend two years at the London School of Economics as a Ph.D. student in economics and then completed my Ph.D. in political economy at the University of Toronto. Was named a John W.Dafoe fellow, a CMHC fellow and a Canada Council fellow. I also was named a Woodrow Wilson fellow in 1968 after completing my first class honours undergraduate degree. Worked as an economist in the area of education, labour economics and as the senior economist with the Manitoba Housing and Renewal Corporation for the Government of Manitoba from 1972 to 1978. I also have worked as an economic consultant for MDT socio-economic consultants and have been consulted on urban planning, health policy, linguistic duality and public sector finance questions by the governments of Manitoba, Saskatchewan,the cities of Regina and Saskatoon, Ontario and the Federal government of Canada. I have also been consulted by senior leaders of the British Labour party, MPs from the Progressive Conservative party, the Liberal party and the New Democrats on economic policy questions. Members of the Government of France under the Presidency of Francois Mitterand discussed my work on public sector deficits. I have also run for elected office at the municipal level. I first began to write about quantitative easing as a useful policy option during the early 1980s.
This entry was posted in U.S., Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s