Canadian election television debate Harper under attack stonewalls

Stephen Harper faced a barrage of accusations and criticism about his performance as Prime Minister last night but he stayed largely unflappable in the face of the severe criticism sent his way by Michael Ignatieff, Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe. In televised debates perception is everything so despite the solid heavy body blows that the opposition leaders landed it is not yet clear how the debate was received by its television viewers. The various partisan spinners and spinners in disguise who work as newspaper journalists largely awarded the debate on points to either Harper or Jack Layton but many viewers may have a different sense of the debate.

However Michael Ignatieff suffered from a disadvantage in terms of his camera location and even the graphics background that was behind him. Ignatieff was located third over from the left as the viewers saw standing between Jack Layton and Gilles Duceppe. This tends to give the passive tv watcher the false impression that it is Layton who stood between Ignatieff on his left and Harper on his right who is the central figure to watch in terms of the opposition to Harper. In the French debate Ignatieff should insist that he switch positions with Layton to avoid this problem twice in a row. Harper also had the advantage of the sharpest and most clearly defined background graphic black and white bars while Ignatieff was largely televised against an NDP yellow and orange beige background which gave a less sharp impression. These observations may all seem petty and irrelevant but unfortunately as Mcluhan and others have shown us perception on tv is very different from perception in real life, particularly for the large segment of the population that is moved by imagery rather than substance. Harper also looked straight into the camera and therefore openly addressed the television viewer at home conveying the impression of an honest unflappable leader who is simply trying to take care of the people’s business while being unfairly harassed by these pesky opposition politicians who are emotional and distort the facts. Of course, this is all Conservative spin but the viewers don’t all know this. The debate in French should be  more advantageous to Ignatieff since his French is excellent although clearly Duceppe is the man of the hour in the French debate.

Advertisement

About haroldchorneyeconomist

I am Professor of political economy at Concordia university in Montréal, Québec, Canada. I received my B.A.Hons (econ.&poli sci) from the University of Manitoba. I also completed my M.A. degree in economics there. Went on to spend two years at the London School of Economics as a Ph.D. student in economics and then completed my Ph.D. in political economy at the University of Toronto. Was named a John W.Dafoe fellow, a CMHC fellow and a Canada Council fellow. I also was named a Woodrow Wilson fellow in 1968 after completing my first class honours undergraduate degree. Worked as an economist in the area of education, labour economics and as the senior economist with the Manitoba Housing and Renewal Corporation for the Government of Manitoba from 1972 to 1978. I also have worked as an economic consultant for MDT socio-economic consultants and have been consulted on urban planning, health policy, linguistic duality and public sector finance questions by the governments of Manitoba, Saskatchewan,the cities of Regina and Saskatoon, Ontario and the Federal government of Canada. I have also been consulted by senior leaders of the British Labour party, MPs from the Progressive Conservative party, the Liberal party and the New Democrats on economic policy questions. Members of the Government of France under the Presidency of Francois Mitterand discussed my work on public sector deficits. I have also run for elected office at the municipal level. I first began to write about quantitative easing as a useful policy option during the early 1980s.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s