U.S. 4th quarter GDP shrinks by 0.1 percent: No time to cut spending

The news came as a surprise to many but the 4th quarter of 2012 experienced a slowdown in growth that resulted in a very marginal but nonethess a negative growth rate for the GDP. The source of the problem was a sharp decline in inventory restocking and cuts in military expenditure. Outside of these two categories the economy continued to grow at a slow but steady pace of 1.2 % in private fixed investment and slow but solid growth in real personal consumer expenditures at 2.2%  Exports were also down by 5.7 %.So the picture is somewhat clouded although still relatively positive until we get more data and this preliminary data is adjusted by further statistics published on Feb.28th. Government cuts in both the local and state expenditures which fell by o.7 %, in defense by 22 % and by 15 % for the federal government contributed to the slowdown.

However you assess it it is still negative growth and we need this to be reversed in future reports and hopefully the unemployment data will show some improvement and the fiscal cliff commotion will cease to be a factor. As I have said many times before and economists like Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz and Brad Delong and other Keynesians and post Keynesians this is not the time for austerity and deficit reduction through cut backs. There are considerable contagion risks associated with the failed austerity experiment in Europe and considerable hoarding of cash persists and the risk of a becalmed prolonged slump is still quite real if poor policy choices are made which accent deficit cutting as opposed to stimulus. It would be a serious blunder if the Democrats embraced the Republican obsession with cut backs as being the top priority at a time when the American and global economy is still not out of the woods yet.

Posted in austerity, business cycles, deficit hysteria, deficits and debt, fiscal policy, full employment, U.S., Uncategorized, unemployment | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Boris Backs Britain Away From Austerity

The colourful Tory mayor of London, Boris Johnson has come out forcefully in opposition to the disasterous austerity policies that are at the centre of  Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s economic strategy. Following in the tradition of British Conservative Keynesians like former Prime Minister Harold Macmillan whose family publishing house had been John Maynard Keynes’s publisher,  Johnson speaking at the Davos Economic forum called on Osborne and prime minister David Cameron to abandon the failed austerity program and turn instead to an infrastructure investment stimulus program in order to reverse the slump that Britain now finds itself in teetering on  the edge of a triple dip recession. The timing of his speech was auspicious since the British Office of National statistics released data that showed the British GDP shrank in the last quarter of 2012 by 0.3 %.

If the next quarter shows negative growth the triple dip recession will be official. The Osborne, Cameron , Clegg strategy of growth and employment creation through austerity has clearly failed as I and other Keynesians predicted. The time to admit it and change course is now. Its good to have the Mayor of London on board the progressive lower unemployment train. Its a position that suits his up beat view of London.

Posted in austerity, business cycles, deficit hysteria, full employment, J.M.Keynes, progressives, U.K. economy, Uncategorized, unemployment | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

President Barack Obama Gives Stirring Speech in Moving Inaugural Ceremony

President Barack Obama took the oath of office at the public inaugural ceremony in Washington at noon today. His speech was a detailed call for a reform filled second term which will have broad appeal to the coalition of  American liberals, centrists and other key identity politics groups that he and his team have assembled to win his second term in office. His goal appears to be to ensure that his progressivism will be solidly established in American politics for decades to come. I wish him well . At the moment in global politics he is one of the few bright lights of hope and progressive vision that we have on the horizon. May his second term be one of accomplishment and a rising tide of progressive policy that brings hope and prosperity to the U.S.A. and world politics.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Poli 363 winter 2013

Poli 363   winter 2013  under construction

Poli 363 Fall 2011 . Course outline
Canadian Public Policy :Eight Policy Problems
Professor Harold Chorney
e mail chorney@alcor.concordia.ca or harold.chorney @concordia.ca
Office hours tba.
Course synopsis: This course introduces students to the analysis of selected contemporary public policy problems. We select eight policy issues and examine them intensively over the next 13 weeks. The course is research oriented and requires students to spend time seeking material on the internet and in the library as well as reading extensively in each of the areas from the list of works provided.
There is no formal text that covers all of these areas. However, several works including a collection of readings on the problems of  deficits and debt and public finance and 2 texts on introducing micro and macroeconomic analysis are assigned as texts.In addition students are expected to read a number of blog posts and internet posted articles.
Despite the large class size we will endeavour to have informed discussion and debate in each class. This, however, obliges students to do their work outside of class in order to insure that discussion and debate is well informed and based on research rather than uninformed opinion.
The world of public policy has shifted dramatically during the past few years. The collapse in the stock and financial markets in 2007 and 2008 and early 2009; the pricking of the real estate bubble; the crisis in asset backed commercial paper;the implosion in derivatives; the spate of corporate scandals, fraud and corruption; the sub -prime mortgage collapse in the U.S. and its impact upon the banking system in the U.S.and Great Britain; the general global financial paralysis that followed this collapse; the terrible events of September 11th ,2001; the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,the revolt for democracy in the Arab world, the tragedy of hurricane Katrina on the Gulf Coast, the recent oil spill in the Gulf, the earthquakes in Haiti, Japan and Chile, the collapse of infrastructure in Montreal and Minneapolis, the riots in Britain,the spectre of global warming, the health care and economic debates in the U.S. and Canada have dramatically shifted public opinion in both Canada and the United States and to some extent globally as well.
What was once seen as impossible or passé in terms of government intervention in the economy has now once again been placed at the top of the agenda. Re-regulation, intervention,investment in infrastructure and long term planning and environmentalism as opposed to laissez-faire and growth at all costs and even budget deficits as deliberate policy are back on the agenda. After thirty plus years in the shadows, Keynesian policy is once again somewhat fashionable and even celebrated despite being contested. the election and re-election of President Barack Obama
 despite ferocious Republican opposition to him and his policies is a watershed event in shifting political trends and policy.Corporate executives from finance, manufacturing and transportation, originally participated in the call for intervention, stimulus, bailout and reregulation.The once much vaunted theory of perfectly rational markets and laissez-faire is now once again passé. In recent months there has been an attempt led by right wing Republicans in the U.S. and Conservative politicians in the U.K and Germany to reassert sound finance principles, backed by the revenge  of the bond market and argue that Keynesian stimulus has failed.
But the evidence is not convincing. The U.S. non partisan bureau of the budget has recently reported that the American stimulus was effective in both lowering the unemployment rate and promoting growth and economic recovery.The problem has been that the stimulus was on the small side and undermined by cuts at the state and local level. More is needed if results are to improve. But politically this will be difficult to accomplish.
Keynesian New Deal style policy proposals for reinvestment in infrastructure and fiscal stimulus were advocated by leading American figures like Larry Summers, the former US secretary of the Treasury and former president of Harvard university and initially President Obama’s principal economic advisor, Robert Reich, the former US Labour secretary, Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York, Governor Ed Rendell of Pennsylvania and even then Republican Governor Arnold Schwartzenegger of California as well as Nobel prize winning economists like Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman.
 President Barack Obama implemented a 787 U.S. billion dollar Keynesian stimulus which was designed to reverse some of the damage of the deep recession that followed the financial collapse.A second phase is now clearly necessary but the Congress  seems poised to reject any such plan.The Republicans seemed prior to the recent election rejeuvenated by the radical right wing tea party movement and the fact that they  had captured majority control of  the House of Representatives .But with Obama’s second term and the weakening of the tea party it seems likely that their influence will diminish.
In Canada the clash of political opponents seems less dramatic since the Harper government rather pragmatically endorsed a small but significant stimulus package and the Liberals under the pressure of events abandoned, perhaps only temporarily, their previous hostility to deficit finance. The election dramatically shifted the status of all the parties.
We have now a Harper majority conservative government opposed by a surging NDP who have replaced the Liberals as the official opposition. The tragic death of their leader Jack Layton is an enormous loss, nevertheless for the next 4 years they will lead the opposition in Parliament to the Conservative agenda.The immediate problem in Canada is the fact that this past quarter economic growth in the GDP turned negative because of declining exports. This will feed back into employment and will require more supportive monetary and fiscal policy to avoid a double dip recession.
The re-election of the Bush Republicans to a second term had significant implications for Canada.The crisis in management of the natural disaster following the tragedy of Hurricane Katrina raised some interesting questions about the balance of political forces in the US. The quagmire in Iraq greatly increased dissatisfaction with the Bush Republicans .
The race for the Presidency between Democratic candidate Barack Obama and Republican John McCain turned into not just a major debate about Iraq but also the future direction of the American economy and the role of fiscal and monetary policy.This was even more the case during the contest between Mitt Romney and Obama. The somewhat Keynesian inclined Barack Obama and the Democrats won the election decisively and policy  shifted accordingly.The American Congress at the behest of President Bush had enacted a significant stimulus package which had resulted in a modest Keynes style deficit of about 3 % of the GDP.The Obama stimulus was much larger, understandable in the light of the collapse of the housing market and the crash of derivative products and amounted to over 6 % of the GDP.
In this respect because of different circumstances, the extreme fiscal conservative orthodoxy of Canada’s political parties is now overshadowed by the rediscovery of Keynesian technique in the USA. The refusal to think about the wisdom of stimulus facilitated by deficit spending in Canada now looks and is outdated and anachronistic.
Under the pressure of the changed circumstances the Canadian Harper government finally moved to introduce and have passed a very modest 40 billion dollar stimulus to deal with the recession in Canada.It now no longer calls for an immediate balanced budget or the old now untimely call for balanced budgets ”come hell or high water” that Paul Martin and the Liberals articulated in the early 1990s. This was a major shift in policy even if now the focus has once again returned to cautious austerity.However, the  Toronto G20 meeting reasserted the  misguided claim of conservative central bankers like Jean Claude Trichet of the European Central bank that the stimulus moment had now passed and fiscal tightening was now preferred.The U.S. debt ceiling crisis  further complicated the policy scene and shifted sentiment dramatically in a pessimistic direction.
However this shift is premature and if the global economy continues to slow in response to this shift I expect that Keynesian approaches will be once again be on top of the agenda.The successor to Trichet at the European central bank has been somewhat more open to Keynesian technique but on the whole Europe remains stubbornly opposed to appropriate stimulus despite  11.8 % unemployment. As of the late summer 2011 there was already some evidence of the error of premature austerity being the case in the slowdown in Canadian and U.S. growth and the European debt crisis.

The energy crisis which saw oil prices rise to close to $150 a barrel from below $30 just two years before has had an enormous impact upon public opinion in both countries. Oil prices  then fell to the 70 dollar range.Currently (Jan. 08,2013 the NYMEX futures price for Feb. is $ 93.19   The original spike in prices contributed to the recession.

Since Canada is a net oil exporter and very rich in energy supplies, particularly in Alberta and its oil sands, while the US is a major net importer of oil the economic impact has been quite different in both countries. The issue of the cartel that controls oil prices and its impact upon employment, growth and inflation as well as environmental considerations will continue to be a hot issue in both Canada and the U.S.

Canada must now reassess its historic relationship to the
United States in the light of the on going security needs of both the United States and Canada and our increasing economic dependence upon American export markets in an era where globalization and outsourcing pose important challenges to our prosperity.The frustration of Canadian policy makers and public opinion over soft-wood lumber exports and cross border traffic may lead to a rethink about the terms of free trade with the US. The Democratic party’s apparent preference for a more protectionist trade stance will be an important factor in the years to come.

We explore a number of themes that lead logically out from this new environment in the new global economy of 2013. My goal is to help the student become a skillful policy analyst and an independent thinker about policy issues.

Texts 

Harold Chorney, The Deficit Papers,Montreal: 2010 ed..(available through me)

Joseph Stiglitz, Free Fall:America,Free Markets, and the Sinking of the World Economy

Hassan Bougrine, Ian Parker and Mario Seccareccia eds. Introducing Microeconomic Analysis

Mario Seccareccia and Hassan Bougrine, Introducing Macroeconomic Analysis

Caroline Lucas and Michael Woodlin , Green Alternatives to Globalization

Stephen Clarkson, Does North America Exist ? Transborder Governance under Globalization and the War on Terror

Owen Jones, Chavs:The Demonization of the Working Class(London&N.Y. :Verso books)

Basic background readings:

Harold Chorney, Revisiting Deficit hysteria in Labour/Le travail fall 2004.pp.245-258.(available on internet) (assigned reading)

The Finance Crisis and Rescue, The Rotman School of Management, 2008 (recommended)

Stephen Clarkson, Uncle Sam and US (recommended)

Ha-Joon Chang, Bad Samaritans :The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism (recommended reading)

Joseph Stiglitz, Making Globalization Work (recommended)

Kevin Phillips, Bad Money:Reckless Finance, Failed Politics and the Global Crisis of American Capitalism Viking 2008 (strongly recommended reading)

Simon Johnson and James Kwak, 13 bankers:The Wall Street Takeover and the Next Financial Meltdown, N.Y. : Vintage, 2011.(strongly recommended)

Michael Lewis, The Big Short:Inside the Doomsday Machine, N.Y. : W.W.Norton, 2010.(recommended)

John Kenneth Galbraith, The Economics of Innocent Fraud(recommended reading)

Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order, Simon and Schuster, 1997.(recommended rerading)

Daniel Drache, Borders Matter: Homeland Security and the Search for North America(recommended reading)

John Dean , Conservatives without Conscience (recommended reading)

George Soros, The New Paradigm for Financial Markets :The Credit Crisis of 2008 and What it Means(Public Affairs)

Thomas Kean& Lee Hamilton et al, The 9/11 Report The National Commisssion on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (recommended reading)

Tim Lewis, In the Long Run We’re All Dead: The Canadian Turn to Fiscal Restraint. (recommended reading)

Joseph Stiglitz, Globalization and its Discontents, 2001.( recommended )

Joseph Stiglitz : The Roaring Nineties: A New Twist on the World’s Most Prosperous Decade( recommended reading)

Harold Chorney, The Economic Benefits of Linguistic Duality in Albert Breton, The Economics of Bilingualism, Ottawa:Canadian Heritage, 1998.(recommended reading also may be available on the internet)

Harold Chorney and Philip Hansen, Toward a Humanist Political Economy, Black Rose, Montreal, 1992. .(recomended reading)

Bai Gao, Japan’s Economic Dilemma:The institutional origins of prosperity and stagnation, Cambridge university Press, 2001.

Phillipe Legrain, Open World The Truth about Globalization, 2002, Abacus Books

Noam Chomsky, 9/11, NY: Open media Book, Seven Stories press,: 2001.(recommended reading)

Lewis Lapham, Gag Rule: On the Supression of Dissent and the Stifling of Democracy (recommended reading)

Doris Sommer, Bilingual Aesthetics (recommended)

George Grant, Lament for a Nation.

Lloyd Axworthy, Navigating a New World:Canada’s Global Future

The Honourable Michael Kirby &the Honourable Margorie Lebreton co chair, The Health of Canadians: The Federal Role, Final Report on the state of the Health Care System in Canada, Vol Six:Recommendations for Reform, (assigned reading)

Jagdish Bhagwati, A Stream of Windows:Unsettling Reflections on Trade, Immigration and Democracy

Jim Stanford,Paper Boom, CCPA, 1999.

Lars Osburg &Pierre Fortin, Unnecessary Debts, Toronto, Lorimer, 1996.

Andrew Jackson,et al, Falling Behind:The State of Working Canada, 2000

Bob Rae, The Three Questions:Prosperity and the Public Good, Toronto Penguin, 1998.

Daniel Drache & Terry Sullivan,eds. Health Reform: Public Success/Private Failure NY: Routledge, 1999

Michael Rachlis & Carol Kushner, Strong Medicine,Toronto:Harper Collins, 1994.(recommended)

Linda McQuaig, The Cult of Impotence:Selling the Myth of Powerlessness in the Global Economy, Viking 1998.

Linda McQuaig, Shooting the Hippo, Viking, 1995.(recommended reading)

Thomas Palley, Plenty of Nothing, The downsizing of the American Dream and the Case for Structural Keynesianism, Princeton University Press, 1998.

Colleen Fuller, Caring For Profit:How Corporations are Taking Over Canada’s Health Care System (strongly recommended reading)

Stephen McBride and John Shields, Dismantling a Nation:The transition to Corporate Rule in Canada.Halifax, Fernwood, 1997.

Jeremy Rifkin, The Age of Access, Tarcher, Putnam Penguin, New York, 2000.
The Empathetic civilization: the race to global Consciousness in a world of crisis.N.Y.:Tarcher Putnam Penguin, 2009

John Grieve Smith, There is a Better Way: A New Economic Agenda, London:Anthem Pres, 2001.

Paul Omerod, Butterfly Economics, NY: Pantheon Books, 2000.

Daniel Lazare, What’s Killing Our Cities and How We Can Stop It, New York:Harcourt, 2001

Edmund P.Fowler & David Siegel, Urban Policy Issues :Canadian Perspectives, Toronto:Oxford University Press.,2002.

Andrew Sancton, Merger Mania: The Assault on Local Government, Montreal: 2000.(recommended)

Harold Chorney, Review of Andrew Sancton’s book Merger Mania in Canadian Journal of Regional Science, vol.23 #1, 2001, pp.175-178.(recommended)

Alan Broadbent Urban Nation:Why we need to give power back to the cities to make Canada strong, Harper Collins,2008.

Harold Chorney , City of Dreams: Social Theory and the Urban Experience, Nelson, 1990

Mark Kingwell, Concrete Reveries:Consciousness and the City, Viking, 2008

Key Web sites:
http://www.cec.org, web site of the North American Commission for Environmental Co-operation.

www. ville.Montreal.qc.Ca, web site of the city of Montreal

IMF; OECD; Eurostat; U.S.Treasury; U.S. Bureau of Labour statistics; Statistics Canada.

GRADE:
The grade will be based on a final exam 50 % and a mid term test in the first week of March  or an essay due in the first week of March  50 %.

TOPICS:
1. Introduction and overview. How does public policy analysis work? The role of interdisciplinarity. Research techniques. Policy and values.Policy and the political process. Globalization and trade. Business cycles and public finance. The long recession.

Policy after the market crash, the credit crisis and the post 9/11 world.
Readings: 9/11 report; Drache.The Rotman school; Phillips, Soros, Chorney blog items on credit crisis, manias panics and bailouts, and the Keynesian revival,Ha-Joon Chang, Stiglitz.Clarkson.

2. The Return of Keynesian economics in public policy.Obama, Bush, McCain,the Tea party Republicans,Romney, Clinton (Hillary and Bill) and the revival of Keynes in the US. Canadian fiscal conservatism . Public finance.The debate about deficits,surpluses, debt and employment. The return of regulation after Enron, Madoff, the crash on Wall street, the banking crisis, the dot com bubble bursting and the credit crisis and sub-prime housing market. The current dilemma,mass unemployment and the possibility of a double dip recession.

Readings: Galbraith; Chorney on revisiting deficit hysteria; on deficits; Tim Lewis , Chorney blog items on revival of Keynes and the financial crisis.Chorney papers from the Eastern Economics association and the Canadian economics association on Keynes and the general theory and on Rediscovering Keynes and the origins of quantitative easing and the crisis. (See this blog, June 3rd, 2011 )Chorney on the role of public enterprise and regulation in The deficit papers. Chorney U tube items on Keynesianism, financial crisis and deficits and debt.

3. The Challenge of Protecting our Health care system. The Canadian, British and American models. Federal provincial disputes over health care. The Romanow Commission. Alberta versus the Federal Government. Market versus public approaches. The American health care debate. The question of affordability.

Readings:Colleen Fuller, Romanow and Kirby Reports available on the internet;Drache and Sullivan; Rachlis and Kushner.Canadian Health Information data base.Clarkson.The New York Times and the Wall Street journal, Huffington post and Salon magazine.

4. The rise and fall of the mega-city of Montreal. The background, the debate, the election and the demerger referenda.The state of politics at city hall.The Mayor and Council.Corruption and Scandal at city hall.  Infrastructure collapse.Budgetary questions.The problem of homelessness. A federal role in cities ? The challenge for local democracy and economic development.
.Readings: Sancton; Aubin; Broadbent;Chorney , Mark Kingwell.

5. Managing the global economy.Corporate behaviour. The problem of capital flows. The Argentine debt crisis.Latin American contagion. The need for new financial architecture. The Tobin tax, debt repayment standstills and reworking exchange rates. Market disorder versus regulated management. Turbulence in Venezuela. Canada and Latin America.Venezuela& oil.The Brazilian third way.The policy stance of the Japanese government with respect to globalization.Keynes in Japan. The European debt crisis and the European Central Bank.
Readings: Galbraith; Stiglitz;internet on Argentina and debt crisis and Venezuela.Clarkson on Nafta; Bai Gao on Japan, Chorney blog.

6. Environmental challenges. NAFTA and managing the environment.The tension between economic growth and the environment.The Kyoto accord. Globalization and Green Politics ? Hurricane Katrina and civil preparedness.Dion’s Green shift.
Readings: Clarkson; Drache; Bhagwati; internet, Lucas and Woodlin Green manifesto

7. Bilingualism: A Canadian defining characteristic.The” Spanish challenge ” in the United States.
Readings: Chorney in Albert Breton; Huntington on the Hispanic Challenge; Sommer on Bilingual Aesthetics.

8.. Canada in a global world; Canadian foreign policy in the era of NAFTA and 9/11. Our security. Our relationship with the United States. The Axworthy legacy. From Axworthy to Manly to Graham to Pettigrew to Baird. A new way forward ? The clash of civilizations ? Chomsky versus Huntington.
Readings: Drache;9/11 report;Chomsky ;Huntington; Axworthy.

9. The energy crunch. Alberta and the problem of fiscal federalism. Sharing the wealth of regional resources. Canadian oil and American needs and Chinese ambitions: an emerging   strategic partnership. The future of free trade.
Readings:Clarkson; tba.

Weekly assignments: September: Read the Revisiting deficit hysteria (internet) and Manias panics and bailouts essays. The first is on the net the second is in my older blog Jan.2009 Begin reading Clarkson and Stiglitz.

Readings: The deficit papers chapters; start with ch. on Keynes, the new introduction to collection, and  Revisiting deficit hysteria.

Essay assignment: Due the first week of March, Thursday class .

Write an essay of 12-15 pages on one of the following topics drawn from the course . Be sure to use a manual of style and properly cite sources and providea bibliography. You should use books, periodical literature and internet sources that are properly noted.

Topics :(under construction)

1. Discuss the debate over deficits, surpluses and debts. Evaluate the Obama stimulus as compared to the Harper one .

2. Explain the origins of the recent financial crash. What role did deregulation and laissez-faire play in this crash. What has been the experience of financial panics and crashes in history.

3. Compare Keynes’ theory of unemployment and anti-recession policy with that of the monetarists.

4. Explore the problem of inflation and unemployment  in a capitalist economy. Can moderate inflation be compatible with real economic growth and low unemployment.

5. What led to the eclipse of Keynes from 1974 to 2008.

6. Explore the oil industry and the global pricing system for oil.

7. What is the history of Canadian health care. How does the Canadian system compare to the American debate over health care and to British health care.

8. Explore the origins of neo-conservatism. How was it able to have such a lasting large impact upon western societies.

9. Discuss the debt crisis and dollar currency boards in Latin America and their impact upon Argentina.

10.Compare and contrast the argument of Noam Chomsky with respect to American power as opposed to the work of Samuel Huntington.

11. Examine the history and evolution of the debate over global warming and Canada’s policy stance toward this critical issue.

12. What has been the Canadian foreign policy orientation. what should it be.

13.Examine the state of free trade between Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.Explore the evolution of the doctrine, its consequences for Canada and its likely future evolution.

14. Explore the roots of the Tea Party in the U.S. How do they compare to Canadian neo-conservatives

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

2013 poli 463 course outline under construction

Poli 463/ 2013 (under construction)

Poli 463/2 fall 2013 course outline under constructionPoli 463/2
Government and Business course outline
Keynes versus monetarists before and after the crash of 2008
Prof.Harold Chorney
Fall 2013 Course overview:This course explores the tools that are necessary to deal with the contemporary global economy and the public policy that is appropriate after the events in the financial markets these past six years, including the re-election of President Obama; the appointment of Mark Carney as the Governor to be of the Bank of England; the resort to sequestration of public spending in the U.S.;and  the on going neo-conservative irrational obsession with fiscal austerity and anti Keynesian doctrine.The crash of September 2008 in the financial markets,the financial bubble that preceded it, the global dimension to the recession which followed it and the presence of widespread significant fraud and excessive reckless risk taking obliges us to reinvigorate standards of regulation in the public interest and to understand the full dimension of financial instability.Governments all over the world have reacted by engaging in some degree of  re-regulation, Keynesian deficit finance and a dramatic overhaul of policy to roll back some of the laissez-faire ideology that had come to dominate public policy over the past two decades has reappeared after a thirty year absence.
In recent months  during and after the Presidential  election of 2012 there has been considerable backtracking as the defenders of laissez-faire and the Republican critics of President Barack Obama have reasserted the ”wisdom” of laissez faire against what they claim are the failures of liberal socialism and Keynesian intervention and social engineering. Jean Claude Trichet the former head of the European central bank has also been outspoken in his defense of sound finance and budget balance. The new head of the European  central bank, Mario Draghi has been slightly more flexible but on the whole still follows the monetarist path. Mark Carney after a successful but also lucky term at the Bank of Canada has moved on to head the Bank of England promising more flexible transparent policy than his predecessor Mervyn King. Despite the monetary policy promise of greater flexibility at the ECB, austerity rather than stimulation has been adopted by Europe and consequently there has been a major rise in the rate of unemployment and the slump in Europe has deepened.In Britain there is now after a period of negative growth a slight uptick in the growth rate but not strong enough to significantly lower the unemployment rate which is still 7.8 %.Hence the debate between the two schools continues.The new British coalition Liberal Conservative Government under the leadership of David Cameron and Nicholas Clegg has unfortunately also embraced sound finance and budget slashing despite the severity of the recession in the U.K. and the evidence that Labour’s return to Keynesian stimulation was working
.In the past this course examined intensively the clash between the Keynesians and the monetarists and the impact of this paradigmatic debate upon public policy. It also examined the neo-conservative and neo-liberal ideology and the break these ideologies have made with post-war liberalism, progressive toryism and social democracy. It argued the case for a return to Keynesian public policy.This has happened to an extent in the leading capitalist economies like the US, Canada and Japan, post crash. In many respects the American Presidential administration of Barack Obama has led the way, although critics like Nobel prize winners Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman and others have argued that the American stimulus was too small and improperly focused. It had also been undertaken minimally in Europe with Great Britain and to a lesser extent France initially leading the way, with Germany a very reluctant follower. But in the past year Europe has reversed course and foolishly embraced austerity. Despite considerable resistance it has, in a much less dramatic fashion, been undertaken in Canada by the Harper conservative government. Although, here also the Government and its central bank governor were too quick to re-embrace fiscal orthodoxy despite the elevated unemployment.We shall still do some exploration of the history of the previous monetarist classical macroeconomics paradigm but I intend to spend much more time this year on deepening our understanding of how the Keynesian technique of demand stimulation is intended to work, the implications for public policy, and how I believe it should work given all of the economic and ideological changes that have occurred over the past thirty years. We will also explore the current return to austerity in Europe and the sovereign debt crisis in Europe. The politics of Keynes’s political economy as opposed to those of the pro-austerity Hayekians will also be explored.
We will also look briefly at   the environmental movement and assesses how environmentalism and green public policy can be integrated with Keynesian approaches to globalization.We explore the transition from the original Keynesian welfare state to the neo-con/neo-liberal doctrine of balanced budgets, free trade and unregulated globalization and to its consequences and now to the partial return of a refurbished Keynesian approach to public policy. The role of the media and popular culture in transmitting these changes is also explored.The impact of the successful Obama campaign for the Presidency as well as the Republican neo-conservative counter-attack will also be explored in terms of its impact upon public policy.

Texts and basic readings:

The first four works are basic texts and will be  available from the text book store , where possible the library on reserve,or in the case of Keynes on the net.  In addition there is a collection of papers The Deficit papers available from from me.My blog also contains a number of key readings.

John Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money.

Joseph Stiglitz, Free Fall:America, Free Markets and the Sinking of the World Economy , 2010

Peter Clarke, Keynes:The  Rise, Fall, And Return of the 20th Century’s Most Influential Economist, New York :Bloomsbury Press, 2009.

The Rotman School of Management, The Financial Crisis and Rescue:What went wrong? Why? What lessons can be Learned ? Toronto:U of Toronto Press, 2008.

Harold Chorney, The Deficit Papers available from me in electronic format.

Paul Krugman, End This Depression Now! N.Y. W.W.Norton,

Course overview:

This course explores the tools that are necessary to deal with the contemporary global economy and the public policy that is appropriate after the events in the financial markets these past three years.The crash of September 2008 in the financial markets,the financial bubble that preceded it, the global dimension to the recession which followed it and the presence of widespread significant fraud and excessive reckless risk taking obliges us to reinvigorate standards of regulation in the public interest and to understand the full dimension of financial instability.

Governments all over the world have reacted by engaging in re-regulation, Keynesian deficit finance and a dramatic overhaul of policy to roll back the laissez-faire ideology that had come to dominate public policy over the past two decades. In recent months there has been some backtracking as the defenders of laissez-faire and the Republican critics of President Barack Obama have reasserted the ”wisdom” of laissez faire against what they claim are the failures of liberal socialism and Keynesian intervention and social engineering. Jean Claude Trichet of the European central bank has also been outspoken in his defense of sound finance and budget balance. Hence the debate between the two schools continues.The new British coalition Liberal conservative Government under the leadership of David Cameron and Nicholas Clegg has unfortunately also embraced sound finance and budget slashing despite the severity of the recession in the U.K. and the evidence that Labour’s return to Keynesian stimulation was working.

In the past this course examined intensively the clash between the Keynesians and the monetarists and the impact of this paradigmatic debate upon public policy. It also examined the neo-conservative and neo-liberal ideology and the break these ideologies have made with post-war liberalism, progressive toryism and social democracy. It argued the case for a return to Keynesian public policy.

This has happened in the leading capitalist economies like the US and Japan, post crash. In many respects the new American Presidential administration of Barack Obama has led the way, although critics like Nobel prize winners Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman argue that the American stimulus was too small and improperly focused. It has also been undertaken in Europe with Great Britain and to a lesser extent France leading the way, with Germany a very reluctant follower. Despite considerable resistance it has, in a much less dramatic fashion, been undertaken in Canada by the Harper conservative government.

We shall still do some exploration of the history of the previous monetarist classical macroeconomics paradigm but I intend to spend more time this year on deepening our understanding of how the Keynesian technique of demand stimulation is intended to work, the implications for public policy, and how I believe it should work given all of the economic and ideological changes that have occurred over the past thirty years.

We also explore the environmental movement and assesses how environmentalism and green public policy can be integrated with Keynesian approaches to globalization.

We explore the transition from the Keynesian welfare state to the neo-con/neo-liberal doctrine of balanced budgets, free trade and unregulated globalization and to its consequences and now to the return of a refurbished Keynesian approach to public policy. The role of the media and popular culture in transmitting these changes is also explored.The impact of the successful Obama campaign for the Presidency will also be explored in terms of its impact upon public policy.

Other core readings:

Hyman Minsky, Stabilizing an Unstable economy

Can ”It” Happen again?:Essays on instability and finance

John Maynard Keynes

Kevin Phillips, Bad Money:Reckless finance, Failed Politics and the Global Crisis of American Capitalism

David Mendell, Obama from Promise to Power

Harold Chorney, “On Manias, panics and bail-outs:further thoughts on the financial crisis” see my blog Haroldchorneypoliticaleconomist.piczo.com.

Harold Chorney, Revisiting deficit hysteria, labour/Le travail, #54, 2004 available on the net

Harold Chorney, The Global Financial Crisis, the Re-emergence of Keynes and the Role of Quantitative Easing
paper Presented to the World Congress of Social Economics, Concordia university, Montréal, June 2010 (excerpt on blog.)

Harold Chorney Restoring full employment:the natural rate of inflation versus the natural rate of unemployment paper presented to the Conference on Social Policy as if People Matter, Adelphi university, Garden City New York, November 12, 2004 (available on net)

Alvin Hansen, A Guide to Keynes (on reserve)

Sidney Blumenthal, The rise of the Counter-establishment:From Conservative Ideology to Political Power

Desmond King, The New Right:Politics, Markets and Citizenship

Brian Snowdon and Howard Vane, eds. A macroeconomics reader, 1997.

Snowdon and Vane, Modern Macroeconomics:its origins, development and current state.Edward elgar, 2006

The following are some selected basic supplementary readings.You are not expected to read them all but rather portions of some of them. Some of them will be placed on reserve. Others are available through the library .They are intended to help with your research papers and illustrate the breadth and richness of the literature in the area.

John McMurtry, Unequal freedoms:the global market as an ethical system.

Adam Harmes, The Return of the state: protestors, power brokers and the new global compromise, douglas and mcIntyre, 2004.

Henry M.Paulson,Jr. On The Brink, Inside the Race to Stop the Collapse of the Global Financial System, N.Y. :Business plus, 2010;

Scott Patterson, The Quants:How a New Breed of Math Whizzes Conquered Wall Street and Nearly Destroyed It, N.Y.: Crown Business, 2010;

William Cohan; House of Cards:A Tale of Wretched Excess on Wall Street,N.Y.:Random House Doubleday, 2009;

Benoit Mandelbrot & Richard Hudson, The Misbehaviour of Markets:A Fractal View of Financial turbulence, N.Y.:Basic Books, 2004;

Haroldchorneypoliticaleconomist.blogspot;

Nouriel Roubini & Stephen Mihm, Crisis Economics:A crash course in the future of finance, N.Y.&London: the Penguin Press, 2010;

Paul Jorion, La Crise:Des subprimes au seisime financier planétaire,Paris, France: Fayard, 2008;

Richard Posner, A failure of Capitalism:The crisis of 08 and the descent into depression, Cambridge, Mass. and London U.K., 2009;

Bill Bamber & Andrew Spencer,Bear Trap: The Fall of Bear Stearns and the Panic of 2008, New York :Brick Tower Press, 2008;

Richard Bookstaber,A Demon of Our Own Design: Markets, Hedge funds and the Perils of Financial Innovation,Hoboken N.J., John Wiley & sons, 2007 )
John Kenneth Galbraith, The Great Crash,1929
Alvin Hansen, Monetary theory and Fiscal Policy.
Fausto Vicarelli, Keynes:The Instability of Capitalism
George Soros, The New Paradigm for financial markets..
Charles Kindleberger, Manias, Panics and Crashes.
The World in Depression:1929-1939.
David Colander and Dewey Daane, The Art of Monetary Policy.
J.A. Trevithick , Involuntary Unemployment:Macroeconomics from a Keynesian Perspective.
Robert Kuttner, Obama’s Challenge: America’s Economic Crisis and the Power of a Transformative Presidency.
Tim Lewis, In the Long Run We`re all Dead: The Canadian Turn to Fiscal restraint.(on reserve)
Robert Ascah, Politics and Public debt:the Dominion, the Banks and Alberta’s Social Credit.
Doug Henwood, Wall Street.
Richard Parker, John Kenneth Galbraith: His Life, His Politics , His Economics.
Peter Clarke, The Keynesian Revolution in the Making.
Will Hutton, The Revolution that Never Was: an Assessment of Keynesian Economics.
Lawrence Klein, The Keynesian Revolution.
J.C.Gilbert, Keynes’Impact on Monetary Economics.
Axel Leijonhufvud, On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes.
Gary Teeple, Globalization and the Decline of Social Reform(reserve)
Jonathon Michie and John Grieve Smith eds., Managing the Global Economy.
David Held & Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, Taming globalization: frontiers of Governance.
Bao Gao, Japan’s Economic Dilemma:the institutional origins of prosperity and stagnation.
Sidney Blumenthal, The Rise of the Counter Establishment, From Conservative Ideology to Political Power.
Armand Van Dormael, Bretton Woods: Birth of a Monetary System.
Robert Lucas, Studies in Business Cycle Theory.
Milton Friedman,” The role of monetary policy” The American Economic Review, 1968, vol.58, March, pp.1-17 reproduced in Brian Snowdon and Howard Vane, A Macroeconomics Reader.
Alan Blinder, The fall and rise of Keynesian economics, Economic Record, 1988, December reproduced in Snowdon and Vane., A Macroeconomics Reader
James Tobin, “Price Flexibility and output stability:an old Keynesian view.Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1993 vol7, Winter. reproduced in Snowdon and Vane.a Macroeconomics reader
David Laidler, Monetarism:an Interpretation and an assessment.Economic Journal,1981, vol.91 March reproduced in Snowdon and Vane.
F.A.Hayek, The Fatal Conceit:The Errors of Socialism.
Allan Meltzer, A History of the Federal Reserve, Vol. 1:1913-1951.
James Rock ed. ,Debt and the Twin Deficits Debate.
Robert Heilbroner and Peter Bernstein, The debt and the Deficit:false Alarms/Real Possibilities.
Harold Chorney& Phil Hansen, Toward a Humanist Political Economy
Joseph Stiglitz, The Roaring Nineties;
Making Globalization Work
Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific revolutions;
Adam Harmes, The Return of the State:Protesters, power brokers and the new global compromise;
Georges Campeau, From UI to EI:Waging War on the Welfare State;
Stephen Clarkson, Uncle Sam and Us.
Michael Woodin & Caroline Lucas, Green alternatives to Globalisation.
Al Gore, An Inconvenient Truth,the planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it.
Nicholas Stern, Review Report on the economics of climate change to the British government (available on the internet)
Gwyne Dyer, Climate Wars.
Rubin Simkin, Comments on Consumption, Income distribution and Growth (on reserve)
E.F.Schumacher, Small is Beautiful.(on reserve)
E.J.Mishan, the Costs of Economic Growth (on reserve)
J.Kenneth Galbraith, The New Industrial State (on reserve)
The Affluent Society (on reserve)
A Short history of financial euphoria.
Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, The Entropy Law and the Economic Process (on reserve)
Joseph Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis.
Paul Davidson, Post Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory.
H.Binhammer, Money and Banking and the Canadian Financal System
Alan Booth, British Economic Policy 1931-1949.Was There a Keynesian Revolution?
Anna Carabelli, On Keynes’ Method.
Leo Pliatzky, The Treasury under Mrs. Thatcher.
L.Randall Wray, Understanding Modern Money.the Key to Full Employment and Price Stability
William Greer, Ethics and Uncertainty, The Economics of John M. Keynes and Frank H. Knight.

Students are also expected to read extensively the financial and quality press each week.These include The Financial Times, The New York Times,the Wall Street Journal, The Guardian,The Globe and Mail, and focus on stories on the economy, the financial crisis and the recovery.

Evaluation: Essay due mid term, the first week of November 50 %

Final exam 50 %.

Topics

1.Introduction and overview.The interface between economics and politics.The art and science of political economy. The recent financial crisis, sub -prime mortgages, bank bailouts and the crash of 2008. The need for stimulus and the revival of Keynes. The eclipse of monetarism.? The challenge of climate change and the protection of the environment. The impact of the crash and challenges before Barack Obama. The rise and fall of the new right.The Canadian response. the origins of macroeconomics.

readings: Chorney, On manias , panics and crashes; Chorney; the introduction to the Deficit papers,Chorney the global financial Crisis, re-emergence of Keynes and origins of Quantitative easing.the essay on Keynes in the Deficit papers;chapter one in Kuttner.Obama’s challenge.chapter one in Phillips. Kindleberger; Galbraith, on the crash and Minsky, introduction to Can it Happen again and editors’ introduction to stabilizing an unstable economy.
chapter one Seccareccia and Bougrinepp.1-33.Snowdon and Vane, introduction.modern macroeconomics.

2.Globalization and the ethical dilemma. Myths and truths about globalization.The environmental challenge.Economic growth and entropy.
Readings: Nicholas Stern, Al Gore;K.Phillips; Stiglitz, introduction and chapter one. John McMurtry pp.1-52.

3. The myth of no alternative.The role of regulation and public enterprise. Laissez-faire versus planning.Hayek versus Keynes. The eclipse of Marx.The rejection of Keynes. Daniel Bell and the End of Ideology. The rise of post-modernism and the new classical macroeconomics.
Readings :Chorney global financial crisis…; Chorney deficit papers :The future of crown corporations:government ownership, Regulation or market control,A Keynesian approach, 1998; Blumenthal; King, Hayek, Mcmurtry, Harmes, Lucas, Friedman,Laidler.

4.The role of the media; political pressure groups;democracy propaganda and the policy process. The rise of the neo-cons.
Media and popular culture in the post modern age.The post war consensus and how it unravelled. Stagflation
and misinterpreting Keynes’s General theory.
Readings :Chorney, the Deficit Papers: The economic and political consequences of Canadian monetarism; Keynes and the problem of inflation.Keynes, the General Theory The two postulates of classical economics; the possibility that labour markets do not clear; the notion of involuntary unemployment.
Blumenthal, King, Block, Chorney, the natural rate of inflation…, Keynes GT ch.1-3; Peter Clarke Keynes, introduction.

5. The consumption function. The multiplier. Savings and investment.The theory of interest rate determination.Readings: Keynes GT; Hansen a guide to Keynes.

6. The controversy over debt and public finance.readings:Cavenaugh, Rock; Eisner; Heilbroner and Chorney: Rediscovering deficit hysteria, The deficit: hysteria and the current crisis and Chorney commentary on the FT’s austerity debate plus U tube video on deficits and debt.

7. The strategy of stimulus. investment in infrastructure. Investment versus tax cuts. The impact of capital flows.
Readings :Chorney blog entries on stimulus and the strategy behind it plus others tba.

8. The roots of neo-conservatism.The cold war. The Vietnam war and the sixties. The OPEC crisis of the 1970s. Stagflation. Thatcher Reagan and Mulroney in the 1980s. The Clinton, Blair and Chretien third way.The Bush and Blair war in Iraq. The challenge of Afghanistan.The resurgence of liberalism in America. Obama’s challenge. The challenge of preserving civil liberties in the age of information and technology.
Readings: blog; Stiglitz Free Fall; Stiglitz The roaring nineties;globalization and its discontents.Chorney and P.Hansen Toward a Humanist Political economy, The falling rate of legitimation ; introduction and Neo-conservatism, social democracy and provinve building;King and Blumenthal.

9. The roots of monetarism.Hayek versus Keynes in the thirties. Friedman versus neo-classical Keynesianism in the sixties and seventies. The post-Keynesians and John Kenneth Galbraith. Towards a new Keynesian paridigm.The return of regulation and the state. The bail-out of the banks , Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and AIG insurance ; cleaning up the bubble,Readings :Stiglitz,Paulson,Phillips, Tobin; Blinder; Davidson;Harmon; Chorney

10. Post and neo-Keynesian policy in the age of OPEC. readings:Davidson,Harmon , others TBA.

11. Development issues. The IMF and the World Bank. The turn to the left in Latin America. The return of full employment ? Capitalism in Asia.
Readings: Stiglitz, Chorney.

12. Prospects for democracy, balanced ecologically sound growth and the compassionate society in the new world order.

Weekly notes: I will use this space to refer students to readings, updates sources etc.

Please note that the reading Harold Chorney,”On manias, panics and bailouts:further thoughts on the financial crisis” is available by referring to my blog. Jan.14, 2009 On manias, panic and bailouts: further thoughts. Keynes GT is on order but also widely available in libraries. There are  numerous copies in the libraries around town including Concordia and it is also accessible on line. Begin reading the first 50 pages and we will discuss it in class.

Please go to the PBS.org site and watch their excellent documentary Inside the financial Meltdown which was broadcast on Frontline.It provides an insightful and personal look at the financial crisis as it unfolded in New York and Washington in 2008.

Essay assignment due in class in the first week of November.
Please research and write a 12 to 15 page essay on one of the following topics or if you prefer propose an alternative topic to me. Be sure to use a manual of style, include a full bibliography and proper notes identifying your sources. Sources should include books, periodical literature, quality financial papers like the Wall Street Journal, the Globe and Mail, The Financial Times or the New York Times well as internet sources.

Possible topics include:

1. Discuss the root causes of the financial crisis. Explore the factors that influenced its unfolding as it has. What are the principal flaws in the economic theory that business leaders and policy makers relied upon that led to this crisis? How must economic theory be reconstructed to avoid these policy failures in the future?

2. Compare and contrast the monetarist approach to public policy and management of the business cycle with the Keynesian schools’ approach.Why and how did monetarism displace the Keynes style approach in the 1970s? Does the current crisis suggest another paradigm shift?

3. Discuss the controversy over government use of deficits to stimulate the economy in an economic downturn.Explore the role of deficits in the current policy environment. How does the Canadian Harper stimulus compare with that of the Obama administration? What is the appropriate monetary policy in conjunction with stimulative deficits ? what impact will the new Osborne budget in the U.K. likely have ?

4. Explore the roots and current operations of the IMF and the World Bank.
What reforms appear necessary at these institutions. Give concrete country based examples.

5. Explore panics, manias and crashes in financial history. How does this panic compare with previous ones ?

6. Explore the theory of the multiplier and Keynes’ theory of investment. How ought we to modify Keynes’ theory of investment to adjust to the current circumstances of globalization ?

7. Explore the roots of neo-conservatism. Does it have a future ?

8. Explore the environmental aspects of economic stimulus. Is there an inherent contradiction between stimulus leading to full employment and sound environmental policy ?

9. What would constitute a viable and contemporary theory of economic liberalism that would respect the social and economic needs of people but at the same time be open to global values ?

 

Other core readings:

Robert Skidelsky, Keynes, The Return of the Master:New York:Public Affairs, Perseus group,+ in U.K.  Allen Lane,  Penguin, 2009,2010.

The following are some selected basic supplementary readings.You are not expected to read them all but rather portions of some of them. Some of them will be placed on reserve. Others are available through the library .They are intended to help with your research papers and illustrate the breadth and richness of the literature in the area.

John McMurtry, Unequal freedoms:the global market as an ethical system.

Adam Harmes, The Return of the state: protestors, power brokers and the new global compromise, douglas and mcIntyre, 2004.

Henry M.Paulson,Jr. On The Brink, Inside the Race to Stop the Collapse of the Global Financial System, N.Y. :Business plus, 2010;

Scott Patterson, The Quants:How a New Breed of Math Whizzes Conquered Wall Street and Nearly Destroyed It, N.Y.: Crown Business, 2010;

William Cohan; House of Cards:A Tale of Wretched Excess on Wall Street,N.Y.:Random House Doubleday, 2009;

Benoit Mandelbrot & Richard Hudson, The Misbehaviour of Markets:A Fractal View of Financial turbulence, N.Y.:Basic Books, 2004;

Kevin Phillips, Bad Money:Reckless Finance, failed politics, and the Global Crisis of American Capitalism, N.Y.:Viking, 2008;

Haroldchorneypoliticaleconomist.piczo.com; Haroldchorneyeconomist.com

Nouriel Roubini & Stephen Mihm, Crisis Economics:A crash course in the future of finance, N.Y.&London: the Penguin Press, 2010;

Paul Jorion, La Crise:Des subprimes au seisime financier planétaire,Paris, France: Fayard, 2008;

Richard Posner, A failure of Capitalism:The crisis of 08 and the descent into depression, Cambridge, Mass. and London U.K., 2009;

Bill Bamber & Andrew Spencer,Bear Trap: The Fall of Bear Stearns and the Panic of 2008, New York :Brick Tower Press, 2008;

Richard Bookstaber,A Demon of Our Own Design: Markets, Hedge funds and the Perils of Financial Innovation,Hoboken N.J., John Wiley & sons, 2007 )
John Kenneth Galbraith, The Great Crash,1929
Alvin Hansen, Monetary theory and Fiscal Policy.
Fausto Vicarelli, Keynes:The Instability of Capitalism
George Soros, The New Paradigm for financial markets..
Charles Kindleberger, Manias, Panics and Crashes.
The World in Depression:1929-1939.
David Colander and Dewey Daane, The Art of Monetary Policy.
J.A. Trevithick , Involuntary Unemployment:Macroeconomics from a Keynesian Perspective.
Robert Kuttner, Obama’s Challenge: America’s Economic Crisis and the Power of a Transformative Presidency.
Tim Lewis, In the Long Run We`re all Dead: The Canadian Turn to Fiscal restraint.(on reserve)
Robert Ascah, Politics and Public debt:the Dominion, the Banks and Alberta’s Social Credit.
Doug Henwood, Wall Street.
Richard Parker, John Kenneth Galbraith: His Life, His Politics , His Economics.
Peter Clarke, The Keynesian Revolution in the Making.
Will Hutton, The Revolution that Never Was: an Assessment of Keynesian Economics.
Lawrence Klein, The Keynesian Revolution.
J.C.Gilbert, Keynes’Impact on Monetary Economics.
Axel Leijonhufvud, On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes.
Gary Teeple, Globalization and the Decline of Social Reform(reserve)
Jonathon Michie and John Grieve Smith eds., Managing the Global Economy.
David Held & Mathias Koenig-Archibugi, Taming globalization: frontiers of Governance.
Bao Gao, Japan’s Economic Dilemma:the institutional origins of prosperity and stagnation.
Sidney Blumenthal, The Rise of the Counter Establishment, From Conservative Ideology to Political Power.
Armand Van Dormael, Bretton Woods: Birth of a Monetary System.
Robert Lucas, Studies in Business Cycle Theory.
Milton Friedman,” The role of monetary policy” The American Economic Review, 1968, vol.58, March, pp.1-17 reproduced in Brian Snowdon and Howard Vane, A Macroeconomics Reader.
Alan Blinder, The fall and rise of Keynesian economics, Economic Record, 1988, December reproduced in Snowdon and Vane., A Macroeconomics Reader
James Tobin, “Price Flexibility and output stability:an old Keynesian view.Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1993 vol7, Winter. reproduced in Snowdon and Vane.a Macroeconomics reader
David Laidler, Monetarism:an Interpretation and an assessment.Economic Journal,1981, vol.91 March reproduced in Snowdon and Vane.
F.A.Hayek, The Fatal Conceit:The Errors of Socialism.
Allan Meltzer, A History of the Federal Reserve, Vol. 1:1913-1951.
James Rock ed. ,Debt and the Twin Deficits Debate.
Robert Heilbroner and Peter Bernstein, The debt and the Deficit:false Alarms/Real Possibilities.
Harold Chorney& Phil Hansen, Toward a Humanist Political Economy
Joseph Stiglitz, The Roaring Nineties;
Making Globalization Work
Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific revolutions;
Adam Harmes, The Return of the State:Protesters, power brokers and the new global compromise;
Georges Campeau, From UI to EI:Waging War on the Welfare State;
Stephen Clarkson, Uncle Sam and Us.
Michael Woodin & Caroline Lucas, Green alternatives to Globalisation.
Al Gore, An Inconvenient Truth,the planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it.
Nicholas Stern, Review Report on the economics of climate change to the British government (available on the internet)
Gwyne Dyer, Climate Wars.
Rubin Simkin, Comments on Consumption, Income distribution and Growth (on reserve)
E.F.Schumacher, Small is Beautiful.(on reserve)
E.J.Mishan, the Costs of Economic Growth (on reserve)
J.Kenneth Galbraith, The New Industrial State (on reserve)
The Affluent Society (on reserve)
A Short history of financial euphoria.
Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, The Entropy Law and the Economic Process (on reserve)
Joseph Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis.
Paul Davidson, Post Keynesian Macroeconomic Theory.
H.Binhammer, Money and Banking and the Canadian Financal System
Alan Booth, British Economic Policy 1931-1949.Was There a Keynesian Revolution?
Anna Carabelli, On Keynes’ Method.
Leo Pliatzky, The Treasury under Mrs. Thatcher.
L.Randall Wray, Understanding Modern Money.the Key to Full Employment and Price Stability
William Greer, Ethics and Uncertainty, The Economics of John M. Keynes and Frank H. Knight.

Students are also expected to read extensively the financial and quality press each week.These include The Financial Times, The New York Times,the Wall Street Journal, The Guardian,the Globe and Mail, and focus on stories on the economy, the financial crisis and the recovery.

Evaluation: Essay due mid term, the first week of  March 50 %

Final exam 50 %.

Topics

1.Introduction and overview.The interface between economics and politics.The art and science of political economy. The recent financial crisis, sub -prime mortgages, bank bailouts and the crash of 2008. Sovereign debt , the euro and the potential of quantitative easing. The need for stimulus and the revival of Keynes. The eclipse of monetarism.? The challenge of climate change and the protection of the environment. The impact of the crash and challenges before Barack Obama. The rise and fall of the new right.The Canadian response. the origins of macroeconomics.

readings: Chorney, On manias , panics and crashes; Chorney; the introduction to the Deficit papers,Chorney the global financial Crisis, re-emergence of Keynes and origins of Quantitative easing.the essay on Keynes in the Deficit papers;chapter one in Kuttner.Obama’s challenge.chapter one in Phillips. Kindleberger; Galbraith, on the crash and Minsky, introduction to Can it Happen again and editors’ introduction to stabilizing an unstable economy.
chapter one Seccareccia and Bougrinepp.1-33.Snowdon and Vane, introduction.modern macroeconomics.

2.Globalization and the ethical dilemma. Myths and truths about globalization.The environmental challenge.Economic growth and entropy.
Readings: Nicholas Stern, Al Gore;K.Phillips; Stiglitz, introduction and chapter one. John McMurtry pp.1-52.

3. The myth of no alternative.The role of regulation and public enterprise. Laissez-faire versus planning.Hayek versus Keynes. The eclipse of Marx.The rejection of Keynes. Daniel Bell and the End of Ideology. The rise of post-modernism and the new classical macroeconomics.
Readings :Chorney global financial crisis…; Chorney deficit papers :The future of crown corporations:government ownership, Regulation or market control,A Keynesian approach, 1998; Blumenthal; King, Hayek, Mcmurtry, Harmes, Lucas, Friedman,Laidler.

4.The role of the media; political pressure groups;democracy propaganda and the policy process. The rise of the neo-cons.
Media and popular culture in the post modern age.The post war consensus and how it unravelled. Stagflation
and misinterpreting the General theory.
Readings :Chorney the deficit papers: The economic and political consequences of Canadian monetarism; Keynes and the problem of inflation.Keynes, the General Theory The two postulates of classical economics; the possibility that labour markets do not clear; the notion of involuntary unemployment.
Blumenthal, King, Block, Chorney, the natural rate of inflation…, Keynes GT ch.1-3; Peter Clarke Keynes, introduction.

5. The consumption function. The multiplier. Savings and investment.The theory of interest rate determination.Readings: Keynes GT; Hansen a guide to Keynes.

6. The controversy over debt and public finance.readings:Cavenaugh, Rock; Eisner; Heilbroner and Chorney: Rediscovering deficit hysteria, The deficit: hysteria and the current crisis and Chorney commentary on the FT’s austerity debate plus U tube video on deficits and debt.

7. The strategy of stimulus. investment in infrastructure. Investment versus tax cuts. The impact of capital flows.
Readings :Chorney blog entries on stimulus and the strategy behind it plus others tba.

8. The roots of neo-conservatism.The cold war. The Vietnam war and the sixties. The OPEC crisis of the 1970s. Stagflation. Thatcher Reagan and Mulroney in the 1980s. The Clinton, Blair and Chretien third way.The Bush and Blair war in Iraq. The challenge of Afghanistan.The resurgence of liberalism in America. Obama’s challenge.
Readings: blog; Stiglitz Free Fall; Stiglitz The roaring nineties;globalization and its discontents.Chorney and P.Hansen Toward a Humanist Political economy, The falling rate of legitimation ; introduction and Neo-conservatism, social democracy and provinve building;King and Blumenthal.

9. The roots of monetarism.Hayek versus Keynes in the thirties. Friedman versus neo-classical Keynesianism in the sixties and seventies. The post-Keynesians and John Kenneth Galbraith. Towards a new Keynesian paridigm.The return of regulation and the state. The bail-out of the banks , Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and AIG insurance ; cleaning up the bubble,Readings :Stiglitz,Paulson,Phillips, Tobin; Blinder; Davidson;Harmon; Chorney

10. Post and neo-Keynesian policy in the age of OPEC. readings:Davidson,Harmon , others TBA.

11. Development issues. The IMF and the World Bank. The turn to the left in Latin America. The return of full employment ? Capitalism in Asia.
Readings: Stiglitz, Chorney.

12. Prospects for democracy, balanced ecologically sound growth and the compassionate society in the new world order.

Weekly notes: I will use this space to refer students to readings, updates sources etc.

Please note that the reading Harold Chorney,”On manias, panics and bailouts:further thoughts on the financial crisis” is available by referring to my blog. Jan.14, 2009 On manias, panic and bailouts: further thoughts. There are also numerous copies of Keynes’s GT in the libraries around town including Concordia and it is also accessible on line. Begin reading the first 50 pages and we will discuss it in class.

Please go to the PBS.org site and watch their excellent documentary Inside the financial Meltdown which was broadcast on Frontline.It provides an insightful and personal look at the financial crisis as it unfolded in New York and Washington in 2008.

Essay assignment due in class in the first week of  March .
Please research and write a 12 to 15 page essay on one of the following topics or if you prefer propose an alternative topic to me. Be sure to use a manual of style, include a full bibliography and proper notes identifying your sources. Sources should include books, periodical literature, quality financial papers like the Wall Street Journal, the Globe and Mail, The Financial Times or the New York Times well as internet sources.

Possible topics include:

1. Discuss the root causes of the financial crisis. Explore the factors that influenced its unfolding as it has. What are the principal flaws in the economic theory that business leaders and policy makers relied upon that led to this crisis? How must economic theory be reconstructed to avoid these policy failures in the future?

2. Compare and contrast the monetarist approach to public policy and management of the business cycle with the Keynesian schools’ approach.Why and how did monetarism displace the Keynes style approach in the 1970s? Does the current crisis suggest another paradigm shift?

3. Discuss the controversy over government use of deficits to stimulate the economy in an economic downturn.Explore the role of deficits in the current policy environment. How does the Canadian Harper stimulus compare with that of the Obama administration? What is the appropriate monetary policy in conjunction with stimulative deficits ? what impact will the new Osborne budget in the U.K. likely have ?

4. Explore the roots and current operations of the IMF and the World Bank.
What reforms appear necessary at these institutions. Give concrete country based examples.

5. Explore panics, manias and crashes in financial history. How does this panic compare with previous ones ?

6. Explore the theory of the multiplier and Keynes’ theory of investment. How ought we to modify Keynes’ theory of investment to adjust to the current circumstances of globalization ?

7. Explore the roots of neo-conservatism. Does it have a future ?

8. Explore the environmental aspects of economic stimulus. Is there an inherent contradiction between stimulus leading to full employment and sound environmental policy ?

9. What would constitute a viable and contemporary theory of economic liberalism that would respect the social and economic needs of people but at the same time be open to global values ?

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Keynes’s Fundamental Equations From The Treatise on Money

The symbols used in A Treatise on Money are somewhat different from the General Theory  and for those who are familiar with GT but not the Treatise are a little confusing at first.

See both Keynes’s A Treatise on Money vol.1 ch.10 and Robert Dimand’s work The Origin of the Keynesian Revolution and his chapter on the Treatise and the fundamental equations. See also Mario Seccareccia’s working paper,”Aspects of a new conceptual integration of Keynes’s Treatise on Money and the General Theory:Logical Time Units and Macroeconomic Price Formation, April 2002;  and Fausto Vicarelli, Keynes the Instability of Capitalism,Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania press, 1984, pp. 65 ff; and A. Asimakopulos, Keynes’s General Theory and Accumulation, Cambridge :Cambridge University Press, 1991. pp. 13-17.

These symbols are as follows:

O total output of  goods in a physical sense per unit of time. So that O =R+C

R volume of liquid consumption goods and services flowing on to the market per unit of time.

C the net increase of Investment goods in physical units.

E  earnings of community or factors of production per unit of time or cost of production

S savings that is difference between money income and money expenditure on current consumption  E-R =S

I’ cost of production of new investment that is the current output of investment goods

I value in price terms of the current new output of investment goods

P price level of liquid consumption goods and services,  the reciprocal of the purchasing power of money

P’ the price level of investment goods

π price level of output as a whole

Q1 windfall profits  in consumption goods sector

Q2 windfall profits in investment goods sector

Q windfall profits for the economy as a whole ; not included in E or S so that Q=Q1+Q2

W rate of earnings per unit of human effort so that its inverse 1/W is the labour power of money.

W1 rate of earnings per unit of output E/O that is the rate of efficiency earnings and

e the co-efficient of efficiency such that W=eW1 so that e measures units of output per unit of human labour. So, for example, assume the wage is $10 per hour and five units of output are produced in an hour.Hence $10/5 =$ 2 the amount of labour cost in a unit of output. and e =5 so that eW1 =$10 the hourly wage.

M1 income deposits, cash held  by individuals

M2 business deposits cash deposits held by entrepreneurs

M3 savings deposits, held as investments , not to finance expenditures

Vi velocity of circulation of Mi  i =1,2, 3

L foreign lending private capital account

B foreign balance current account

G gold outflow or other balancing transactions G=L-B

Since P= is price level of liquid consumption goods, P.R= current expenditure on consumption goods and  E. C/O = I’ is cost of production of new investment.

Since expenditure on consumption goods equals difference between income and savings we have   P.R=E-S = E/O(R+C)-S = E/O.R + I’-S

(  Note that O=R+C so the expression E/O(R+C) reduces to E and since I’= E. C/O or E/O. C) we can substitute I’ for C and the expression becomes E/O .R +I’-S)

So P= E/O + I’-S/R  (1)

(i.e. I’-S all over R.  Keynes has divided each side by R to arrive at this. )              This is his first fundamental equation.

It states that the price level of liquid consumption goods is the outcome of  total earnings  per unit of output plus any differences between investment costs of production and savings in comparison to the flow of liquid consumption goods.

Dimand points out that this links windfall profits to entrepreneurs that go beyond their normal remuneration since I can exceed I’.  That is the cost of production of new investment is less than the value of it when sold on the market. It is this possibility for windfall profits that disappears in the General Theory(GT) when Keynes redefines income, savings and investment.Instead Keynes has the output level readjust to bring investment into equality with savings in the GT. See his discussion of windfalls and his redefinition of income,  savings and inverstment GT pp.52-61 and pp.60-61 in particular.

Friedrich A. Hayek was sharply critical of Keynes definition of terms  and his choice of units ( see his Reflections on the Pure Theory of Money  Hayek argues that Keynes operates with far too broad and ambivalent definitions of profits, for example which Hayek describes as ” a peculiarity which is likely to prove a stumbling block to most readers, the concept of entrepreneur’s profits. These are expressly excluded from the category of money income, and form a separate category of their own”    Furthermore,he objects to the way in which Keynes calculates the prices of finished products.

“he treats the process of the current output of consumption goods as an integral whole in which only the prices obtained at the end for the final products and the prices paid at the beginning for the factors of production have any bearing on its profitableness. He seems to think that sufficient account of any change in the relative supply (and therefore in the value) of intermediate products in the successive stages of that process is provided for by his concept of (positive or negative) investment, i.e., the net addition to (or diminution from) the capital of the community. But this is by no means sufficient if only the total or net increment (or decrement) of investment goods in all stages is considered and treated as a whole, and the possibility of fluctuations between these stages is neglected; yet this is just what Mr. Keynes does. ”   Keynes responded to Hayek’s critique in an article in Economica published in November , 1931. (See Vol 13, JMK: The General theory and After Part 1 Preparation pp 243-256. He rejected Hayek’s criticisms by reviewing his choice of terms and definitions, clarifying them as best he could and concluding that Hayek lacked good will toward the author and was in fact wedded to is own theory to such an extent that he could not appreciate Keynes’s work. Keynes went on to scathingly review Hayek’s own work Prices and Production  Keynes argued that the book seemed to him “as one of the most frightful muddles he had ever read”…It is an extraordinary example of how starting with a mistake a remorseless logician can end up in Bedlam. ” (p.252) see vol. 13, JMK: The General theory and After Part 1 Preparation, p.252. after exchanges like this it is not surprising that Keynes and Hayek became foes of one another , at least at the level of theory .

After Keynes derives his first fundamental equation he introduces the possibility of wage push inflation. Let W be the rate of earnings per unit of human effort, W1 the rate of earnings per unit of output and e the coefficient of efficiency so as above W=e.W1 then  rewriting eq.1

P=W1 + I’-S/R (all over R) (2)   =  1/e.W + I’-S/R  (3)  Keynes writes of this equation the price level of consumption goods -the inverse of the purchasing power of  money consists of these two terms. The first represents efficiency earnings or the cost of production ;the second is positive, negative or zero accordingly as the cost of new investment exceeds,is less than or equals the volume of current savings. So the stability of the purchasing power of money requires that efficiency earnings should be constant and that the cost of new investment should be equal to the volume of current savings.  Hence it is possible that even if efficiency earnings are stable investment savings disproportionalities can result in price pressure. As Keynes states:”the division of output between investment and goods for consumption is not necessarily the same as the division of income between savings and the expenditure on consumption. For workers are paid just as much when they are producing for investment as when they are producing for consumption; but having earned their wages, it is they who must please themselves whether they spend or refrain from spending them on consumption. Meanwhile, the entrepreneurs have been deciding quite independently in what proportions they shall produce the two categories of output.” Treatise vol. one ch.10 p.136   The price level of consumption  goods is determined independently of the price level of investment goods. Keynes then assumes that the price level of investment goods is given and he shows how the price level of output as a whole can be determined.

Let P’ be the price of new investment goods, π the price level of output as a whole, and I as distinct from I’ , the market value as distinct from I’ the cost of production of the increment of new capital goods.

Hence π =P.R+ P’.C/O (all over O)   = (E-S)+I/O (all over O) since I=P’C and P.R=E-S.

which is equal to E/O + I-S/O (4) which is the second of the fundamental equations.

Equation 4 can be rewritten as π = W1  + I-S/O  (5)     =1/e.W + I-S/O   (6)

Since W1 = E/O and 1/eW = W1.

Now Keynes turns to profits.

He lets Q1 be profit on the production and sale of consumption goods where profit is defined as a positive windfall that exceeds normal entrepreneurial remuneration. Recall that Keynes is using a Marshallian market model where perfect competition is the norm and windfalls are exceptional except where the business cycle creates them.  Q2 the corresponding profit on investment goods and Q the total profit.  then Q1 = P.R – E/O .R  =E-S – (E-I’)   = I’-S   (7)  So Q1 as Dimand explains is “the excess of the market value of the output of consumer goods over the earnings of the factors of production employed in that sector. ” (p.25)  P.R is the market value of consumer goods and E/O .R is the earnings of the factors of production in that sector.  Q2 = I-I’  and Q = Q1 + Q2   =I-S  (8) since Q1 + Q2 = I-I’ + I’ – S .

So profits on the production and sale of consumption goods are equal to the difference between the cost of new investment and savings and are negative when savings exceed the cost of new investment. Total profits on total output equal the difference between the value of new investment and savings, being negative when savings exceed the value of new investment.  Keynes then states equations 2 and 5 can be reworked as   P = W1 + Q1/R  (9)    and π = W1  + Q/O  (10)

Keynes concludes that equations 9 and 10 state “the price of consumption goods is equal to the rate of earnings of the factors of production plus the rate of profit per unit of output of consumption goods; and correspondingly with output as a whole.”

Keynes admits that these equations are identities “truisms which tell us nothing in themselves. ” But he believed that once fleshed out with data and analysis from the real economy they would help trace cause and effect in building a monetary theory of production. The circus of his younger followers in their critique of the treatise and in particular the notion of the widows’ cruse as somehow applying to entrepreneurial profits remaining undepleted by consumption but becoming a Danaid jar when entrepreneurs saved rather than consumed were convinced that Keynes needed to go further. In the critique offered by Austin Robinson according to Skidelsky,  Keynes is faulted for not having considered the problem of falling output and general depression which makes the widow’s cruse invalid.(See R.Skidelsky , JMK vol 2 The Economist as Saviour 1920-1937, p 447-448.) As Asimakopulos argues Keynes’s statement about the widows cruse and his fundamental equations “assume constant output, clearly not a basis for a general theory.” (p.17 , Keynes’s G.T.) However, Asimakopulos also admits that Keynes does not always assume constant output through out the Treatise. This was precisely the point that Keynes himself made in response to Robinson’s critique.

Asimakopulos also points out that because  Keynes defines profits as windfalls in the Treatise unlike in the GT savings will not equal invstment as it does in the GT where savings always adjust through the means of adjusting the total output to equal investment. “The actual sales proceeds of firms could differ from what the value of  the output produced would have been if equilibrium prices had prevailed. the differences between these sums represent windfall profit(if positive) or losses(if negative) and Keynes excludes these items from his definition of income. ” hence the difference in the treatise between savings and investment ”because saving is defined as the value of this notional income(income that includes normal profits whether they are obtained or not) minus actual consumption expenditures, while investment is represented by actual investment expenditures.” Because sales equals the sum of investment and consumption expenditures, investment equals these proceeds minus consumption. “A difference between savings and investment thus arises under these definitions whenever the value of Keynes’s notional income differs from actual sales proceeds. Investment exceeds (falls short of)saving by the amount of the windfall profits(losses) that occur when market forces result in actual prices for output that are higher(lower) than normal prices.” (Asimakopulos,  pp.13-14)  For Keynes, then in the Treatise, was trying to develop a method for analysing how fluctuations in price as well as in output could result from profit fluctuations that were traceable to differences in savings and investment.

In addition  Keynes was already trying in the treatise  to establish the virtue of consumption but hadn’t yet made the total transition to his theory of aggregate demand and the pivitol role of investment. This he soon turned to in the writing of his General theory. Nevertheless, despite its flaws the Treatise clearly establishes that Keynes had a sophisticated theory of the operations of the price system and the possible sources of inflation  and underemployment  which he incorporated in the GT in his chapter on prices showing that profit push, wage push and supply demand bottlenecks could establish inflationary pressure well before the point of full employment. The fact that the monetarist camp and the neo classical Keynesians had paid scant attention to the treatise and to the chapter on prices in the GT meant that when stagflation occurred they were unaware that Keynes had anticipated such a possibility  more than forty years before.

Keynes concludes his chapter on the fundamental equations by relating them to the quantity theory of money that he still was operating with although attempting to move beyond in the Treatise. He first explains that when savers decide the proportion of their money income that they wish to save as opposed to consume they must make a decision as to what proportion of their savings to hold in the form of bank deposits versus securities or cash or other forms of loan capital. He refers to this decision as a choice between” ‘ hoarding’ and’ investing.’ ” (p.141)

It is here that he begins to develop his theory of liquidity preference and his explanation  of the role of interest and the inverse price of securities that later plays an important role in his notion of the liquidity trap in the GT.  (p.142) He goes on to argue that price level of output as a whole and the amount of total profit depends upon 4 factors: the rate of saving, the cost of new investment, the bearishness of the public and the volume of savings deposits (p.143-144) He reduces these to ” the excess of savings over the cost of investment and the excess of bearishness on the part of the public as is unsatisfied by the creation of deposits by the banking system.”

So already it is clear that expectations play an important role in Keynes’s description of the workings of the price and output system. Keynes also suggests that the original quantity theory is in need of modification as a explicandum of price change. “If the volume of saving becomes unequal to the cost of new investment, or if the public disposition toward securities takes a turn …in the bullish or bearish direction, then the fundamental price levels can depart from their equilibrium values without any change having occurred in the quantity of money or in the velocities of circulation. …(this is true in the theoretical world) In the actual world a change in anything is likely to be accompanied by some change in everything else. But even so the degrees of change in the quantity of money, the velocities of circulation, and the volume of output will not be related in any definite or predictable ratio to the degrees of change in the fundamental price levels. Indeed this is notoriously the case at the acute phases of a credit cycle.” (p.147)

He concludes the chapter by reverting to a quantity theory style restatement of his conclusions.  In the case of equilibrium where I-I’ = S then if M1 is total income deposits +V1 their velocity then

π = P =M1V1/O    and if M1,M2, M3 are the totals of income deposits, business deposits and savings deposits and M total deposits then

P = V1(M-M2-M3)/O and then let w be the proportion of cash deposits to total deposits and V the average velocity of the cash deposits where V1 and V2 are the velocities of income deposits and business deposits  then   M1+M2= wM

and M1V1 + M2V2 =wM.V    then

M1=  M. (w(V2-V)/V2-V1    and  M1V1 = M(wV1(V2-V)/V2-V)  so  P=M/O . wV1(V2-V)/V2-V1

He notes  that P.O= M1V1   is similar to Irving Fisher’s P.T = M. V  except that O is output rather than transactions and M1V1 represent income deposits and their velocity  but M,V are cash deposits and their velocity.

Posted in austerity, business cycles, classical economics, European unemployment, fiscal policy, full employment, J.M.Keynes, monetary policy, treasury view, U.K. economy, U.S., Uncategorized, unemployment | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

”Entitlement”programs is a loaded term:Social Democratic Minimum is a Better More Accurate One

During the fiscal cliff negotiations in the U.S. one hears the term ”entitlement” programs frequently. This is of course an ideologically loaded term that by its very nature seeks to suggest that basic social democratic minimum programs like health care, social security and other civilized social programs that seek to moderate the harsh impact of unfettered capitalism and the excessive inequalities it can deliver are somehow greedy, selfish and unaffordable and privileged. The American political scientist Ira Katznelson some years ago named these programs social democratic minimum programs and explained that every western society had variants of these programs in place. The size of these programs , the extent of their coverage and the level of benefits they disbursed were a function of the state of play of political forces in a society at any given point. Much like a piston in a chamber they moved up or done depending on the play of forces. If progressives were in power or ascendent then the piston rises. If conservatives are in charge or ascendent the piston is forced downwards. So in any further debate of these programs lets describe them as they truly are” social democratic minimum “programs and drop the loaded term entitlements.

Posted in classical economics, community, free trade and globalization, Keynesian welfare state, U.S., Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

US Unemployment Rate Falls to 7.7% from 7.9%:Positive trend continues

 

The latest U.S. unemployment rate shows a continuation of the positive trend of lower unemployment and a gradually healing eeconomy. The headline rate for November 2012 dropped two tenths of a percentage point to 7.7 % from its October rate of 7.9 %.It was 8.7 % a year ago this November.The broader definition of unemployment which includes the headline number plus all persons marginally attached to the the labour force plus all those employed part-time for economic reasons when they would rather work full time as a percentage of the civilian labour force plus all persons marginally attached also fell to 14.4 % from 14.6 % last month. This rate was 14.7 % in September 2012 and 15.0 % a year ago this past November. So slow but steady progress continues. The rate for men over 20 is now 7.2%, women over 20 7.0 % , teens 16-19 23.5 % white people 6.8 % black or African Americans 13.2 % down from 14.3 % last month and 15.5% a year ago; Hispanics 10.0 % down from 11.4 % a year ago. The rate for Asian American workers was 6.4 % largely unchanged from the 6.5 % rate  a year ago.

The employment to population ratio is now 58.7 % up from 58.5 % a year ago but down from 58.8 5 last month. The number of people employed is 143.262 million down from 143.384 last month but up from the 140.614 reported a year ago.

The participation rate was 63.6 % down from 63.8 % last month and 64.0 % a year ago. Here again we need to be cautious about interpreting the statistic because of growing retirements among older baby boomers. All in all the results are encouraging although there is still plenty of distance to travel to restore prosperity.

HOUSEHOLD DATA
Table A-15. Alternative measures of labor underutilization (Courtesy of U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics)

[Percent]
Measure Not seasonally adjusted Seasonally adjusted
Nov.
2011
Oct.
2012
Nov.
2012
Nov.
2011
July
2012
Aug.
2012
Sept.
2012
Oct.
2012
Nov.
2012
U-1 Persons unemployed 15 weeks or longer, as a percent of the civilian labor force 4.9 4.3 4.2 5.0 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.3
U-2 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs, as a percent of the civilian labor force 4.7 3.9 3.9 4.9 4.6 4.5 4.2 4.2 4.1
U-3 Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official unemployment rate) 8.2 7.5 7.4 8.7 8.3 8.1 7.8 7.9 7.7
U-4 Total unemployed plus discouraged workers, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus discouraged workers 8.9 8.0 7.9 9.3 8.8 8.6 8.3 8.4 8.3
U-5 Total unemployed, plus discouraged workers, plus all other persons marginally attached to the labor force, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force 9.7 9.0 8.8 10.2 9.7 9.6 9.3 9.3 9.2
U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force 15.0 13.9 13.9 15.6 15.0 14.7 14.7 14.6 14.4
NOTE: Persons marginally attached to the labor force are those who currently are neither working nor looking for work but indicate that they want and are available for a job and have looked for work sometime in the past 12 months. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached, have given a job-market related reason for not currently looking for work. Persons employed part time for economic reasons are those who want and are available for full-time work but have had to settle for a part-time schedule. Updated population controls are introduced annually with the release of January data.According to Statisics Canada the unemployment rate in Canada fell to 7.2 % from 7.4 % also a positive development.
Posted in American Presidential election, business cycles, fiscal policy, full employment, U.S., Uncategorized, unemployment | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Hoarding, speculation and the problem of unemployment

The classical school of economics always argued that wages would adjust to clear gluts of unemployed workers over a reasonably short period of time and that cash would not be hoarded but used to purchase bonds or otherwise spent on either investment or consumption. In this way markets would clear and involuntary unemployment would not be a problem. But today throughout the leading capitalist countries of Europe and in North America we have many examples of hoarded cash, principally in the treasuries of companies but also in certain banks and financial institutions and at the same time not surprisingly elevated unemployment.  How did this happen and why is hoarded cash a barrier to lower unemployment. Once again it is Keynes that provides us with the answer.

Keynes developed three motivations for holding cash: transactions, precautionary reasons , and finally speculative reasons. The first two reasons are straight forward enough .One can actually combine them under the rubric of transactions One needs a certain amount of cash to acquire the things people want to buy. Also there can be unexpected needs for cash during the day, hence precautionary motivations. But it is the third that is the most important in understanding how hoarding can cause unemployment. Bond prices and interest rates on bonds move in the opposite direction. If bond prices rise interest rates fall and if bond prices fall interest rates rise. This aspect of bond market behaviour became the central explanati0n that Keynes relied upon to explain the possibility of unemployment in the real world economy. Unlike the classical model in which there appeared no advantage in hoarding cash once we introduce the speculative motive it becomes clear there will be times when expectations about the limits to lower interest rates have been reached and bond buyers expect interest rates to rise and bond prices to fall they will hang onto cash to avoid the losses associated with falling bond prices when rates rise.

So the classical school postulated a demand for money that was transactions dominated   M= lPy derived from the classical quantity theory. But Keynes critically expanded the demand for money to include a speculative demand M=lPy+L(r) since

M=Mt + Ms

Mt=lPy      and     Ms=L(r)

hence M= lPy + L(r)  ( see Gardiner Ackley  Macroeconomic Theory, p402 & pp.201 ff Macmillan, N.Y.:1961)

Once we introduce the possibility of hoarding as Keynes called it or quasi-hoarding as I prefer to call it, prolonged unemployment gluts become possible.This is because the hoarded cash is not being invested and the economy needs to shrink to bring swollen intended savings into equality with diminished intended investment.Total aggregate demand can only support a smaller level of ouput so long as the hoarded cash does not circulate. So long as the cash hoards are not spent they contribute nothing to job creation. An equilibrium at much below full employment is created. This unfortunately is the position of the global economy today. This is why we continue to need major economic stimulus  to break out of the liquidity trap.

Posted in business cycles, classical economics, deficit hysteria, European unemployment, free trade and globalization, Greek sovereign debt crisis, monetary policy, treasury view, U.K. economy, Uncategorized, unemployment | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Mark Carney chosen to head the Bank of England: Bold Decision Big Challenges Ahead

The Decision of the British government to appoint the Canadian central banker Mark Carney as the new Governor of the Bank of England , the crown jewel of central banks, is a bold decision by Chancellor George Osborne and PM David Cameron . It is a rare day indeed when Britain draws upon Canadian talent for one of the top jobs in the U.K. historically it is usually the other way around. But the financial crash and fragile recovery has changed all of that. Britain suffered severely in the aftermath of the crisis and many of its banks were either bankrupt or in serious trouble as a consequence of lax regulation, unbridled greed, incompetence, fraud and lack of sufficient regulatory oversight. Canada largely because of its long standing tradition of cautious prudence and deep distrust of the banks did not suffer the same sort of banking collapse as did Britain. Furthermore , its officials including Carney were quick to respond and tighten regulatory oversight. So Mark Carney’s reputation as a deft manager of the financial system and a top quality central banker rose along side that of Canada. Canada’s employment performance was also judge positively despite the fact that we suffered from a quite severe recession and unemployment rose to above 8 %. from 6 % in 2007. It currently sits at 7.4 %. It is higher in industrial heartland regions and places like Quebec , the Atlantic provinces and to a certain extent southern Ontario still have the feeling of being stuck in recession even though growth is positive. This is the kind of economy that Mark Carney has presided over. Carney comes from a financial markets background and as Gavin Davies suggests in his commentary on Carney’s appointment in the FT he was not regarded as a macro policy specialist or theorist so much as a financial markets specialist. It is these latter skills and talents and work experience 13 years with Goldman Sachs and his recent work on the Financial Stability group that were the basis of his attraction to the British. But Britain doesn’t just face the problem of of getting financial regulation right. It also has to deal with the very real problems and threat to economic recovery and employment posed by the problems in Europe and the contradictions of its own fiscal policy which has been strongly biased toward austerity and deflation at a time when stimulus is needed. So we shall see how Mr.Carney responds to these challenges. His appointment begins in July, 2013. By then the trends ought to be clear. In Canada Carney was a conventional monetarist who positioned himself pragmatically close to the centre of the Taylor rule monetarist consensus adopting an inflation target of 2 %. Actual inflation according to the most recent data has been running below that and there are signs of the Canadian economy slowing down. So despite his constant warnings of increasing interest rates in practice he kept the rate close to or at 1 % once he realized that rate reductions were required to prevent an even greater recession. The challenge in Britain is whether Carney will understand the potential great danger of combining excessive fiscal orthodoxy with monetary tightening and act appropriately, despite strong voices urging anti-inflationary orthodoxy. We shall see soon enough.

Posted in austerity, Canada, European debt crisis, European unemployment, fiscal policy, monetary policy, quantitative easing, treasury view, U.K. economy, Uncategorized, unemployment | Tagged , , | Leave a comment