The Canadian social democratic movement has had 10 leaders in its history ever since the CCF was founded in 1932 in its founding convention in Calgary. All of them including Hazen Argue who switched to the Liberals after the CCF was disbanded and replaced by the New Party which became the New Democratic Party were people of exceptional quality dedicated to building a different more progressive kind of Canada. They have now chosen their 11 th leader for the first time drawn from their MPs in Quebec. Although David Lewis was originally from Montreal and a graduate of Baron Byng high school and a friend of A.M. Klein and Irving Layton two Montreal poets who along with Mordechai Richler formed an extremely creative literary circle in Montreal, Lewis was elected in Toronto and despite his best efforts never was able to make any sort of breakthrough in Quebec. The new leader Thomas Mulcair is a native Quebecer, a former Quebec Liberal cabinet minister a great grandson of a former Premier of Quebec, Honoré Mercier and as we say in Quebec enraciné in the history of the Province. How well he will do in the rest of the country, particularly given his moderate but clear commitment to Quebec nationalism remains to be seen. But félicitations et bonne chance M. Mulcair. As well congratulations to the other excellent candidates, including particularly Nathan Cullen for his intelligent campaign and open approach that placed the good of Canadians above pure narrow partisan loyalties.
-
Recent Posts
- The Perils of Polling: B.C. election delivers rude surprise to pollsters
- Canadian unemployment stable at 7.2 % inflation falls to -0.4 % seasonally adjusted annual rate.
- U.S. unemployment falls to 7.5 % U6, the broad definition is 13.4 %
- The Owl of Minerva takes flight at dusk:The anti-Keynesian era is drawing to a close
- Austerity backers in Europe in retreat ? Barroso calls for re-orientation to growth.
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
Categories
- Alberta
- American Presidential election
- austerity
- balance of payments
- business cycles
- Canada
- China and europe
- cinema
- civil liberties
- classical economics
- community
- Cyprus banks
- deficit hysteria
- deficits and debt
- European debt crisis
- European financial stability fund
- European unemployment
- Federal Reserve
- fiscal policy
- France politics+economy
- free trade and globalization
- full employment
- Greek sovereign debt crisis
- Hayek
- Health care
- Italian debt crisis
- J.M.Keynes
- Japanese unemployment
- Keynesian multiplier
- Keynesian welfare state
- labour market clearing
- Milton Friedman and NAIRU
- modernism versus ^post modernism
- monetary policy
- Mr.Papandreou and democracy
- natural rate of inflation
- NDP Canadian politics
- Olympic games and winning medals
- progressives
- quantitative easing
- quantity theory of money
- Québec
- Québec election
- Schumpeter
- sovereignty of quebec
- Spain
- the metropolis
- treasury view
- U.K. economy
- U.S.
- UK local elections
- Uncategorized
- unemployment
- urban culture
Meta
Nice rundown. I didn’t know TM was related to Mercier. Just curious, do you think Mulcair will bring forward a set of progressive ideas, especially in regards to economic policy? I would like to see him take on 2 percent inflation targeting. I know this policy has been renewed for another 5 years, but now is the time to start the discussion. In my opinion, TM will probably follow most federal politicians by pushing for deficit and debt reduction, as well as near zero inflation targeting. He speaks about jobs but seems to lack a good understanding of a true balanced economic approach to fiscal policy.
It would be nice if he did but I do suspect that he may need to rethink the usual anti deficit dogma that most politicians who are lawyers, accountants, and business people are afflicted with. At this point it is unclear what his position is although he clearly cares correctly about jobs and employment and is being guided by polling that tells him that Canadians also care about these issues. In this respect he is no different from a number of prominent politicians in the Liberal party, the Bloc and the NDP who seem to care about the unemployed but do not appear to understand the role that appropriate fiscal and monetary policy can and must play in lowering the unemployment rate. In certain cases they do understand but are convinced by polls that it is not a politically winning strategy that they can successfully explain to the public. i think that they are wrong about this and have thought so for a very long time.